Tesla Motors IPO Set for June 29

What Investors Need to Know about this Electric Car IPO

By
Monday, June 21st, 2010

Parked under the shade of a solid Red Oak in a Whole Foods parking lot, a radiant red Tesla Roadster caught my eye.

Completely electric and boasting a solid range of 245 miles on a single charge, I'm a huge fan and have contemplated getting one for myself in the very near future.

But after getting a peek at the company's Model S sedan, I'm thinking about holding off until they start delivering this beauty — with a 300-mile range — in 2012.

This is the vehicle that Tesla announced it will now be manufacturing in California, thanks to a $465 million loan from the Department of Energy.

Tesla also announced earlier this year that it would be going public. The company plans to offer 11.1 million shares between $14 and $16 a share on June 29 — with $50 million of the stock immediately being sold to Toyota.

You may recall that, just last month, Toyota announced it wanted a piece of the electric car maker for $50 million...

Toyota reps said they hope the combination of the company's expertise in innovation and Tesla's entrepreneurial skills would help Toyota's efforts in making alternative energy vehicles.

There's been a lot of hype over the past few months about this IPO. After all, despite major hurdles, the folks over at Tesla produced a real game-changer with the Roadster.

Until the Roadster came along, most people saw electric cars as nothing more than glorified golf carts. And the major automakers certainly made little effort to disprove this image.

But Tesla did not accept the status quo of mediocrity and complacency. And their hard work should be applauded by both environmentalists and forward-thinking investors.

Of course, a lot has changed since the Tesla Roadster first started turning heads...

Today, we're getting ready to see GM deliver the Chevy Volt and Nissan (NSANY.PK) deliver the all-electric LEAF, not to mention pretty much every other major automaker has an electric vehicle planned for a debut within the next 3 to 5 years.

Even if you question the early stages of electric vehicle development (cost, battery chemistries, etc.), make no mistake about it — electric vehicles represent the next evolution of personal transportation.

And investors are eager to get a piece of this burgeoning market.

But is Tesla the way to go?

There's no doubt that an electric vehicle-related IPO can put the asses in the seats.

Back in September 2009, high-performance battery manufacturer A123 Systems (NASDAQ: AONE) soared more than 50% on its opening day, and kept heading north in the days that followed. For a lot of folks, it looked like A123 was unstoppable.

But around late January, reality started to set in. What once reached a high of $28.20 fell hard to well below $10 a share.

Today, the stock's going for about $9.00 and has fallen to as low as $7.50.

Blind optimism gave way to the sobering reminder that the company has never really been profitable and has a boatload of competition coming around bend.

Don't get me wrong. A123 does have its strengths: major deals with auto manufacturers and utilities; some pretty impressive backing (private capital and government support); technology that could make it a major player in a very short amount of time...

So make no mistake: I am by no means bashing the stock, and in fact I think at current levels it is trading closer to where it should be. Anything below $8.50 is a very attractive entry point right now.

Moving on to the Tesla IPO...

Will we see a repeat of the A123 story?

Hard to say.

Despite the exceptional press Tesla has received over the past couple of years, I don't believe we're seeing the same kind of early hype that we saw with A123. Moreover, Tesla's going public at a time where the broader market can be very unkind to the unknown.

Yes, Tesla is no longer a secret, and its success in bringing the Roadster to the forefront of the transportation conversation was a major accomplishment — because they had the bite to back up that bark.

But the fact is the company posted a net loss of nearly $30 million last quarter and profitability is not around the corner.

What's worse, Tesla's going public at a time when some very notable alternative energy IPOs are getting pulled.

Citing “ongoing uncertainties in the public capital markets,” Solyndra canceled its plans to go public and instead decided to raise $175 million by selling secured convertible notes to existing investors.

And Chinese wind turbine powerhouse Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology also recently pulled its high-priced IPO, due to volatile market conditions.

Basically, the Tesla IPO (which will trade under the symbol TSLA on the NASDAQ), will be swimming upstream against a very hostile and unpredictable broader market.

It will also be the focus of many bearish articles from both reputable analysts in the space and your typical bashers who still haven't figured out that you can actually make a lot of money in alternative energy. It really is quite pathetic to watch “investors” choose political and social philosophy over profits.

Nonetheless, I think anyone who counts Tesla out at this early stage of the game could be in for a surprise.

Personally, I don't see how Tesla can maintain the $14 to $16 price they're putting on this thing. As much as I love the company, it's hard to justify that kind of price tag for this stock.

However, this is also not a company that should be counted out before they even get out of the gate.

Consider that Tesla's Roadster debuted at a Santa Monica airplane hangar in 2006... At that time, hardly anyone was talking about electric cars — and most who were thought for certain that this little start-up would get crushed under the weight of GM, Toyota, and Ford.

But that didn't happen.

And I can assure you that there were plenty of suits in Detroit, perched on their overpriced leather chairs, looking forward to watching Tesla fail miserably.

Today, the suits in Detroit (after the taxpayers bailed out their failing companies), are building their own electric cars in their factories.

It's the beginning of something very, very big. And Tesla — despite all the odds that were stacked against them nearly five years ago — has successfully evolved and progressed.

To assume that such a company would fail now, when the marketplace is actually less hostile than it was five years ago, is not a safe assumption to make.

Yes, I have no doubt that this stock may be able to shoot out of the gate, but it'll lose steam fast. Although when it does, we might see a more appropriate price for the stock. And it is then that we can re-evaluate.

Because one thing's for sure: If there's any company that can thrive in a negative, bearish environment, it's this one.

We'll have more on Tesla in the coming months.

Until then, if you're looking for a solid electric vehicle play now, check out this little Chinese player that's manufacturing both electric cars and the high-performance batteries for those electric cars.

To a new way of life and a new generation of wealth...

jeff signature

Jeff


Media / Interview Requests? Click Here.



Editor's Note: From solar and wind to geothermal and biofuels, Green Chip readers want to know which renewable energy resource will take over where fossil fuels leave off. The answer is...all of the above!

There is no one single solution to today's energy crisis. However, the combination of all viable renewable energy resources, coupled with energy efficiency, conservation and smart grid development will not only lead us to energy independence and a cleaner, more sustainable energy infrastructure — but also to what will soon prove to be the greatest investment opportunity of the 21st Century.







Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (15 votes)




Comments:

Comment by everett on 2010-06-21
where is the concern of its electro magnetic fields affecting human physiology....

u already know such fields can cause CanCers
Comment by SolarmanJD on 2010-06-21
first this fool that comminted
earler there is no such evidence
to colaberate these unfounded claims...I will be buying in...
Comment by Barry Larkman on 2010-06-22
Thanks for your honest summary.
Personally I hold Nicola Tesla in very high esteem and it is good to see that a car in his name will not let him down; I am sure he bubbling with joy in Heaven that so many of us know who he is and what he did for mankind and science.
Great work,
Barry Larkman
Comment by Jay Rosenberg on 2010-06-22
EV's are taking a piece of the action because they introduce efficiency (not a consumer cost reduction the cars purchase price).
We are intent on commercializing autos with our high efficiency engine, RET, enabling 150MPG/gallon of 139,000 BTU diesel. It will bend the energy and engine curve. It will sever our dependence on petroleum, coast to coast on 1 tank of gas. Will run on Natural Gas as well. Very high performance, but, drastically reduced operating costs, and increased duty cycle and longevity. Love EV's but, this ICE, will bring traditional autos into the 21st century. RET powered sedans with excellent performance and 150 MPG should cost under $10K, with 500K miles power train warrany. Technology is disruptive and energy / engine tech must ultimately follow a variant of Moore's law.
JR
Comment by Jim Bandinelli on 2010-06-22
Look to the microturbine (the one company with the patented air barring technology) developer to see real next generation changes, on extreme fuel extension, and unbelievable CARB emission reduction (exceeds Cal. emission standards). Announced today, this company has a real world answer.
Comment by Todd on 2010-06-22
Jeff: good article and I would like your take on hydrogen big rigs.....if you have one. So far I have only found one company in the world already partnered with Freightliner that actually makes a zero emission big rig.
Comment by Carl Schoder on 2010-06-23
For a much more efficient electric car, one should check out Apollo Energy Systems electric car design known as the Silver Volt II. This car is powered by ammonia with an on-board ammonia cracker to produce a gas which is 75% hydrogen. The hydrogen is fed into a fuel cell to generate electricity which drives the cars electric motors.
Comment by Mister on 2010-06-24
Great story Jeff! Being a person who makes his living off investing,for the last twenty years,it's nice to see someone write informed,thoughtful stories that are based on facts.

That's why I agree that the price of Tesla Motors is TOO HIGH;yet,will still have a large opening day upward,"pop",because its'a,"hot ipo".

I would either wait until the price comes down(for me...it's basically 90 days after the first day of trading because that's generally when the SEC allows company insiders to sell their shares and that usually means the stock price will be down)then start using cost dollar averaging until Tesla starts showing a profit(which is likely in a few years).

Or,find a publicly traded company that owns a stake in Tesla Motors like A123 Systems(AONE ticker symbol);or,find a company that is in direct competition with Tesla,like Fisker Automotive http://karma.fiskerautomotive.com/ which is co-owned by Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies(QTWW ticker symbol).

After which,buy either stock before Tesla Motors starts trading on the open market;then,sell for a small tidy,profit before the end of trading. Why? Because day traders/stock flippers,and people who couldn't buy Tesla Motors at the ipo price will buy one or both of those stocks to ride on the back of Tesla's upward stock price,or,"pop",because the prices of the shares are much cheaper than Tesla Motors'share price.

And finally...for those whose,"financial stomach",isn't that strong...stay on the sidelines,save up your money in very safe investments until Linkedin,Skype,Twitter,and Facebook announce their respective filing for an ipo in 2011 or later.



SHARE / RATE