Rate:
Share
Views: 4313
Text Size:

Unsustainable Business Practices

Lehman's Solar Casualty

By Jeff Siegel
Tuesday, September 16th, 2008

At Green Chip Stocks, our primary focus is renewable energy. However, we also like to focus some attention on corporate responsibility. After all, a lack of corporate responsibility often leads to unsustainable business practices.

And there's no better case study involving unsustainable business practices than what we're seeing today in the financial sector.

Early this morning, I watched Senator McCain, Senator Clinton, and Senator Obama tell reporters (on different segments of course) that they had been warning about this market meltdown for years.

Then the blame game kicked in, with each side throwing stones at their opponent's glass egos in an effort to secure just one more vote. Because clearly, this is the best way to fix 8 years of a failed economic policy and an arrogant disregard for fiscal responsibility.

Ask most reputable, non-partisan economists today, and they'll tell you that the economy hasn't been this sick since 1929. Ask most politicians, and they'll tell you that they've been trying to avert this catastrophe in an effort to "help the American people."

Really?

Well let's take a look at who's been trying to help us the most, shall we?

The $300 million enabler

Just like any industry today, there are those that spend millions to get on the inside and influence policy. Certainly we've seen this with the oil and gas industry. But what about finance, insurance and real estate - the three sectors that have been collectively feeding our economy hot air and hemlock for years?

When it comes to ponying up for access to Washington's hallowed halls, these guys are no slouches. Certainly they've had no problem convincing those on the Hill to put on their headphones while the warning alarms were going off at the height of the real estate boom.

I have no interest in listening to more sound bites of all these politicians claiming they've been warning about this, and how they want to protect taxpayers.

Not when a total of $311,235,860 in "contributions" ended up in the pockets of our elected officials.

The financial sector is the largest source of campaign contributions to federal candidates and parties. And the bulk of that money comes from investment firms, insurance companies, real estate, and commercial banks.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the top ten contributors for 2008 are:

  1. Goldman Sachs - $4,287,701

  2. Citigroup, Inc. - $3,438,497

  3. JPMorgan Chase - $3,029,568

  4. Morgan Stanley - $2,842,517

  5. National Association of Realtors - $2,525,300

  6. UBS AG - $2,256,060

  7. American Bankers Association - $2,029,088

  8. Lehman Brothers - $1,921,167

  9. Merrill Lynch - $1,824,505

  10. Bank of America - $1,800,504

And who took all this money?

Well, it looks like the top ten are evenly split among Democrats and Republicans.

Take a look:

  1. Barack Obama (D) - $22,501,165

  2. Hillary Clinton (D) - $21,534,852

  3. John McCain (R) - $19,560,938

  4. Mitt Romney (R) - $13,757,677

  5. Rudolph Giuliani (R) - $13,525,832

  6. Christopher Dodd (D) - $5.958,468

  7. Bill Richardson (D) - $3,454,112

  8. John Edwards (D) - $2,148,293

  9. Fred Thompson (R) - $1,932,549

  10. Mitch McConnell (R) - $1,789,829

Forgive me if I don't feel an enormous amount of confidence regarding my concerns as a taxpayer versus the concerns of those companies that shelled out more than $300 million this year.

Caught in a Riptide

After years of complacency and disregard for the economic health of the United States, the dominoes are falling - putting many good companies in a precarious position.

Take Evergreen Solar (NASDAQ:ESLR) for instance.

This is a quality solar firm that's about a year away from profitability. The company has a superior solar manufacturing technology, and just landed a $1.2 billion contract less than 3 months ago. That's billion - with a "B."

Unfortunately, back in July the company completed an offering of $373.8 million in notes due in 2012 with Lehman Brothers as the lead underwriter. And according to analysts, if the existing capped call transaction is not honored by Lehman's successor, Evergreen will have to write off $39.5 million.

The stock lost nearly 30% of its value yesterday!

It really is a shame to see such a quality solar player get caught in this riptide. But this company isn't the only one. There's a long list of casualties now that will only continue to grow. And you better believe that this is going to wreak havoc on your portfolio.

The only advantage we have right now is that no matter what happens on Wall Street, the fundamentals of supply and demand continue to dictate the success of the renewable energy industry. So over the long-term, we still come out ahead.

To a new way of life, my friend...and a new generation of wealth,

jeff signature

Jeff


Editor's Note: From solar and wind to geothermal and biofuels, Green Chip readers want to know which renewable energy resource will take over where fossil fuels leave off. The answer is...all of the above!

There is no one single solution to today's energy crisis. However, the combination of all viable renewable energy resources, coupled with energy efficiency, conservation and smart grid development will not only lead us to energy independence and a cleaner, more sustainable energy infrastructure — but also to what will soon prove to be the greatest investment opportunity of the 21st Century.







Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (20 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by Bill Sproull on 2008-09-16
I think you have the basis for a good arguement here - the financial industry has been buying favor in Washington, but the numbers you use are all over the map, which dimenishes your arguement.

You talk about $300M of influence, you have a list of contributors that only adds up to ~25M, you have contributions to candidates that adds to ~$106M.

Doesn't add up to a credible story, although I do believe in your premise that buoght politicians are as much at fault as anyone.
Comment by Jeff on 2008-09-16
Are we to beleave that the Top Ten Contributed almost 26 Million and Mr. Obama took 22.5 million, of what, that 26 million? So should he be elected we most likley will not see any help on the renewable energy front?? I do not understand the math or connection to renewable energy....outside of that, love the articles keep up the good work.
Comment by Barry on 2008-09-16
I really don't give a rip about your liberal views. I am conservative and green.......deal with it!
Comment by Burton on 2008-09-17
Not very helpful. More rants, inform nothing. Investment bankers have always been slim. When you do business with them, you usually get screwed. Most of the time it only costs money; other times it costs you your business. C'est la vie!
Comment by lisa on 2008-09-17
Good Day Jeff,
Obama said it best, "free market was never meant to be free license to take whatever you can get, however you can get it." deregulation under the guise of "less government" has been the 'repubs mantra. leave us alone so we can steal you blind.

A repub majority lead house and senate in which they had 6.5 yrs to get it right...well its not feeling so "right" now.

Yep, millions are spent on getting on the inside for influence. The mentioned contribution numbers from Ctr for Responsive Politics give us closer look at which candidate is going to help our economy keep this "fundamental of supply and demand" going for the green. All my fact finding thus far tells me its not Mccain.

lmj

Comment by Lee McClune on 2008-09-17
Noted You comment on last '8 years'
it sems the economy was going along
pretty good, lowest unemployment in
many yrs, near record growth, then
what happened about 2 yrs ago, who
took over Congress, the eco has been going to hell ever since, do
we want any more 'Change',??
Comment by Joseph Runsdorf on 2008-09-17
When, exactly, was the last time that a politician placed their constituents ahead of the massive donations they accept from corporations or large donors? This, as you have so aptly illustrated, goes for both sides of the aisle. So the Fed leaks to the big boys their intentions on AIG before they release it to the media and the public. So the market rallies hugely at 1:38 yesterday afternoon with the futures surging 25 points. Who can we trust?
Comment by Rob L on 2008-09-18
I really look forward to the day someday soon, when the public finally gets to see the energy policy developed by Dick Cheney --the one the Administration fought to hide all the way to the Supreme Court. The one that called for opening a new coal-fired plant every month. The report bought and paid-for by Enron.

These are the jerks that made Humvees tax deductible, remember?. No wonder we are where we are now. I just hope they leave peacefully.

Comment by Kalil on 2008-09-18
Jeff:

Your Articles are too political. You are sounding like a spokesman for the Socialist Democratic Party. Your supposed to be a spokesman for "Green" stocks. Please, get with the program!