Rate:
Share
Views: 3265
Text Size:

Negawatt Energy Savings

Already a Reality

By Sam Hopkins
Friday, February 6th, 2009

It's hard to capture absence...

CNN can't play a soundbite of an air conditioner not running, and the Washington Post probably won't print a photo of an unplugged cell phone charger.

But on February 5, President Obama painted the vivid picture of an American economy strengthened by the energy we don't use.

It's a different kind of stimulus, where incremental amounts of power savings add up to both economic relief and fresh capital for reinvestment.

Efficiency Is No Joke

The GOP is doing its best to excise parts of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the "stim" package's legal name), pointing to particular projects as inexpedient or even silly.

National park improvements, family planning funding, and the purchase of hybrid autos for federal service fleets are all extraneous, and the benefits would be too long-term, we're told.

I've seen this movie before.

Back in August 2008, then-Senator and candidate Obama was mocked by McCain supporters for suggesting that regular tune-ups and proper tire pressure in cars and trucks could do a lot to alleviate our energy costs and concerns.

"My friends, this is laughable of course... but it's stupid!" Rush Limbaugh roared.

Advertisement

Bigger Than The Internet

GE calls it "the biggest investment of the first half of the century."

Cisco has claimed it'll be "1,000 times bigger than the internet."

It's called the smart grid. And it's already generating fortunes.

Click here to get all the details and claim your share today.




Well, Obama's "hot air" plan was shared by energy aficionados across a broad spectrum, from Nobel Prize-winning Energy Secretary Steven Chu to NASCAR pit chiefs.

Fast-forward to this Thursday at the Department of Energy, where the President announced 9 types of energy-guzzling household and industrial appliances whose efficiency the DoE will tighten. They include:

  • Ovens
  • Vending machines
  • Microwave ovens
  • Dishwashers
  • Lamps
  • Commercial boilers
  • Commercial air conditioning units
  • Light bulbs
All told, Obama and his energy advisors expect these measures to save $500 billion in electricity costs. "We'll save through these simple steps over the next 30 years the amount of energy produced over a two-year period by all the coal-fired power plants in America," Obama told the gathering of Energy Department employees and media.

Efficiency Stimulus... Demand Response

Now, the new administration seems to have put itself in a bipartisan straitjacket in regards to the actual stimulus plan...

But energy efficiency is a major area where the White House can make some moves by itself. The late-January instruction issued to EPA lawyers to review waivers on auto fuel efficiency was the first in what is now clearly a series of steps towards greater energy savings as part of a comprehensive energy strategy.

In fact, the DoE talk didn't just touch on Obama's energy plans. The President used the platform to push back on economic recovery issues where the opposition has demonstrated a lack of foresight and new thinking.

In his book Investing in Renewable Energy, my colleague Jeff Siegel explores the concept of a negawatt, introduced in 1989 by energy expert Amory Lovins.

Negawatts, in a nutshell, refer to strategic energy savings through grid optimization and common-sense steps like turning off your computer.

We don't blame President Obama for not referring to negawatts, as the public seems to have little appetite for the abstract and is much more keen on political action to restore the economy.

For investors, though, efficiency is a pivotal progress area that will expand research and business opportunities for new energy companies.

Next week, Nick Hodge will push further past even negawatts of energy savings, to a situation that is already a reality for some renewable energy consumers who sell their surplus capacity to the local grid.

Utilities call it Demand Response. For households, it's Net Metering, and by investing in companies that capitalize and the savings you accrue, it could make you a fortune.

Have a great weekend,

 

sig

Sam Hopkins

International Editor

PS. Nick is already guiding thousands of readers to profits via energy efficiency companies and other firms benefiting from all the 'green' programs in the new stimulus. In fact, he closed out three positions this morning for a total gain of 65.33%. And there's much, much more to come. Click here to ensure you receive Nick's next winning recommendation.


Editor's Note: From solar and wind to geothermal and biofuels, Green Chip readers want to know which renewable energy resource will take over where fossil fuels leave off. The answer is...all of the above!

There is no one single solution to today's energy crisis. However, the combination of all viable renewable energy resources, coupled with energy efficiency, conservation and smart grid development will not only lead us to energy independence and a cleaner, more sustainable energy infrastructure — but also to what will soon prove to be the greatest investment opportunity of the 21st Century.







Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (18 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by Dick Hermes on 2009-02-06
I notice that Sam ovwerlooks the fact that fossil fuel power sources are never completely shut down and electricity is always flowing through the entire system. Simply turning off saves the individual, but the system still has to be functioning at all times. Obama's stated goal is have approximately 2% of electricity produced by alternative sources as a result of his stimulus package. Nuclear energy would be a much sounder investment. All alternative power sources have to be backed up.
Comment by Edward Martin on 2009-02-06
Ladies and Gents, from what I've seen and heard complete loyalty to an idea not a man or his vision is the criteria used to pick the new cabinet and it's subordinants. All visable ones demonstrate a centralized eurocentric/socialist viewpoints and that unfortunately would be the wrong engine for any progress and redefine a new political envirostructure that could very easilly be cuddled in the democrat party umbrella, like major news media,..union issues and community organizing.. It is worrysome would'nt one agree ?
Comment by Mark Wall on 2009-02-07
When I signed up for the GCR a year ago I didn't realize it was a partisan newsletter. There might be great info inside, but spare me the partisan politic crap. There are several real questions the American people should be asking about this $900 billion stimulus plan. Stop shoving the cool-aid in my face and give me facts! I'm on the verge of concelling my subscription.
Comment by Augusto on 2009-02-07
Thanks Sam: I will like to ask you if you have information regarding a technology that produce energy, and most of all ,ethanol from garbage. It seems to me that this concept will be one of the best greensoluton on the search for a sustainable alternative fuel.
Its really important the practice of these negawatts as same as the use of the different alternative energies you promote in your letters. The world is in desperate need for action on this matter and Mr Obama is taking the bull by the horns as Mr Roosvelt took it in times of war; a war between the power behind the old money and the new one to come.

Thanks againfor your input
Best of success
Augusto
Comment by T. Albrecht on 2009-02-07

Now that "your man" on Pennsylvania Ave. has taken over, we can expect the government to dictate what will be done. When the market place gets control, as it will, we'll see real improvement. Some good ideas here, but you don't throw the baby out with the bath water !

The most important paragraph in this info,is the last! Your disclaimer! It is, after all, make money time. By the way, obama doesn't think of these things he's machine politician who gets his "strings" pulled by others ! Let's quit the kidding around the election, and the fools who are allowed to voted have had their way. Half of them who didn't even know who he was running with.
Comment by ARRY on 2009-02-07
President Obama is correct in his concern at the wasting of energy in the home and commercially. There ae manyy new tech equipments that burn energy 24 hours and are never used. For example the radio phone that is plugged in to power the batteries, which are a waste of electricity. Phone lines have their own power source, so you can do without them. There are many ways of reducing waste and I am sure that if all take heed and try to save , you will find results
Comment by Phil on 2009-02-08
I agree with conservation, and already participate in a personal effort. I particularly appreciate solar from which 95%+ of all energy is derived. What I do not appreciate is partisan commentary, which is inappropriate in my opinion, and will not be tolerated. So please discontinue your e-mails.
Comment by Ivan Filippov on 2009-02-08
Sam, I had my suspicions earlier but after reading this article, I am convinced that Obama has pull wool over your eyes too. Have you lost your mind? If your letter is not an investment-advising piece, but a political support for the party represented by Obama, then please cancel my subscription. The saving over the next 30 years are laughable, and besides who cares. Show me one concrete example of Obama energy plan, without the political rhetoric, where one can expect to invest and make money. If you do that then I will stay, otherwise bye, bye …
Sincerely, Ivan Filippov
Comment by Clark on 2009-02-09
All this talk about being energy independent. That's great, but nobody has figured out how to make current technology work without a huge amount of our tax dollars for subsidy. Take the holy grail ethanol for example...
1. 51¢ per gallon federal blenders credit for $2.5 billion = your tax dollars.
2. $0.9 billion in corn subsidies to farmers for ethanol corn = your tax dollars.
3. $3.6 billion extra paid at the pump. This is still after your tax subsidy.

That's ridiculous when you figure it only made us 1.1% more energy independent and only reduced US greenhouse gases by 1/19 of 1%.

All those subsidies and Verasun still goes bankrupt.

Face the facts...Allowing the free market to work freely without subsidies is still the only way to get to efficient energy independence that works.
Comment by Mustela on 2009-02-09
Remember Jimmy Carter? SSDD (Same Stuff Different Decade). As investors we need to get in and out fast. This is a fantastic short term opportunity. Take your profits before the inflationary wave crests and get out! In the 70s some of us stayed in too long. When the tax credits stopped it was too late.
Comment by ChuckL on 2009-02-11
While the things that you are espousing for the environment may be useful to the world as a whole, as well as your portfolio, they are not things that will lead us out of the current production and financial crash.

Good investments do not necessarily make for job creation which is what is needed now. In many cases good investments are good for the investor only because they reduce jobs.

As an investor information source, The Green Chip Review is a useful source. As an economic recovery plan for the country, it is a selfish "rich kids" only planning system.
Comment by ChuckL on 2009-02-11
It seems to me that the reason that AC electric power won out over DC distribution, which Edison pushed, was that DC distribution loses too much energy to heat because of the resistance in the wires, whereas high voltage electricity seems to travel along the wires but generates much less heat. Also, only solar panels generate DC by design. DC generators require brushes, whereas AC generators do not.

American Standard Inc. developed a packaged water chiller in a tonnage range of 60 to 145 that used an AC generator driven by local power, usually an electric motor, although some times a different prime mover, to generate 480 volts, 3 phase, with voltage constant regardless of the actual load. There were no brushes in this design.

Solid state inverters exist that can easily convert solar panel DC to AC at any voltage and any frequency.

There is no demonstrated reason to create a DC distribution grid, but the powerful magnetic field and the heat that would be generated by a high voltage, high amperage
DC distribution grid is a powerful dis-incentive.
Comment by D GRIEVE on 2009-04-24
tHEPILGRIM SOCIETY HAS MADE ALL THE RULES AND A PRINCE HALL MASON (OBAMA) WAS ENDORSED BY THE SKULL AND CROSSBONES. WHEN 9 GIGAWATTS CAN BE CONTINUOUSLY GENERATED BY A DEVICE THE SIZE OF A REFRIGERATOR, ALL THIS OTHER STUFF IS MORE BS. 2009 - 80 = 1929 (1930 - 1936) WERE THE AFTEREFFECTS OF THE JP MORGAN/JDR STOCK BINGES. WE HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM NOW. IT IS NOT THE STOCKS THAT MAKE THE MONEY IT IS THE SHITTING AS JESSE WOULD SAY AND ONE HAD BETTER KNOW WHAT THE MARKET IS DOING. SO MANY IN THE US HAVEN'T A CLUE TO MAKE MONEY AND EVEN MORE SO DO NOT KNOW WHAT TO DO WHEN THEY HAVE IT (MSFT).