Rate:
Share
Views: 4932
Text Size:

Hybrid Electric Cars

These Are The Companies Building Tomorrow's Electric Cars...Today

By Jeff Siegel
Tuesday, June 16th, 2009

About two weeks ago, Coda Automotive (a new electric car manufacturer), announced that it will have an all-electric sedan hitting the California market in 2010. The Coda electric car delivers a range of between 90 and 120 miles on a single charge, with a top speed of 80 mph.

Tianjin Lishin Battery is supplying the batteries for this particular vehicle. You may be familiar with Tianjin, as this is one of the world's largest manufacturers of lithium-ion cells and a key supplier to Apple, Motorola, and Samsung.

Coda is expected to have about 2,700 vehicles available in 2010, with production capacity set to reach 20,000 by 2011.

Of course, Coda's electric car is just one more option in an ever-growing line of higher mpg (or mpg equivalent) vehicles. Truth is, from the smallest suburban garages to the biggest automakers, these next generation, fuel-efficient vehicles really are being developed quite rapidly compared to where we were just a few years ago...

  • GM's still committed to getting the Volt out next year.

  • Ford will be pumping out new electric vehicles in just two years.

  • Mitsubishi recently announced that it will begin leasing its i-MiEV electric car in Japan, next month.

  • Subaru's new Stella EV is expected to be available to consumers this summer

  • Daimler has invested in Tesla Motors (maker of the electric vehicle sensation, the Tesla Roadster), and will use Tesla's batteries in its Smart electric car...which is expected to hit later in the year in a testing phase.

And don't forget the guys (and gals) that are converting conventional and hybrid vehicles to Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEVs)...right now. While conversion are nothing new, the momentum behind conversions is definitely growing and developing.

Advertisement

32% Gains. . . Each and Every Month

One group of energy investors has closed 45 winners in 12 months.

39 of them were double-digit winners.

Click here to see what their next move is.


We recently saw Raser Technologies (NYSE:RZ) show off its electric Hummer (with a 40-mile all-electric range) in Washington. And a small California company - Plug In Conversions Corp. - has just completed a new software upgrade that enables all-electric driving at speeds of up to 70 miles per hour in a converted Prius.

Building Tomorrow's Vehicles...Today

A new generation of engineers is also being groomed to take on the personal transportation challenges of tomorrow. In fact, last Friday, students from Ohio State University took first place in the EcoCAR Challenge - an advanced vehicle technology competition run by the DOE, GM and the Argonne National Laboratory.

Essentially, this challenge requires students to design and build advanced propulsion solutions, utilizing a variety of clean vehicle options. These include...

  • All-electric

  • Range-extended electric

  • Hybrid

  • Plug-in hybrid

  • Fuel cell

The students also incorporate lightweight materials, improve aerodynamics and use alternative fuels, like ethanol, biodiesel and hydrogen.

Interestingly enough, Ohio State also announced a 2,000 mpg-equivalent solar car just last month. It's not a practical vehicle you could drive to work everyday. But the technology that these college students are developing is exactly the kind of technology that so many car manufacturers ignored , or simply denied for decades. Of course, that all changed when gas hit $4.00 a gallon.

Nonetheless, we're certainly excited to see what the future holds for a new generation of fuel-efficient vehicles. And while I am partial to electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (particularly because these vehicles more than meet my needs, as well as the needs of more than half the daily commuting population), there are dozens of potential options coming down the pike. From electrification to advanced biofuels to new designs of old ideas - the race is on to take us out of the stone age of vehicle development...and into the 21st Century.

Which do you think will take the lead?

Let us know your thoughts in the comments section below.

To a new way of life, and a new generation of wealth...

jeff signature

Jeff


Editor's Note: From solar and wind to geothermal and biofuels, Green Chip readers want to know which renewable energy resource will take over where fossil fuels leave off. The answer is...all of the above!

There is no one single solution to today's energy crisis. However, the combination of all viable renewable energy resources, coupled with energy efficiency, conservation and smart grid development will not only lead us to energy independence and a cleaner, more sustainable energy infrastructure — but also to what will soon prove to be the greatest investment opportunity of the 21st Century.







Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (33 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by Tim Kavanagh on 2009-06-16
Are you aware of this company?
They are building Hybrid buses and medium sized trucks ( Purolator Etc..)
They seem to have a solid plan
Comment by John Ancona on 2009-06-16
Thank you
Comment by Randall on 2009-06-16
Give me a clean diesel engine, low noise, smaller carbon footprint Q3 Audi vehicle with low emissions over any electric or hybrid car. In Houston, we have wide open freeways and long commutes just like LA and Dallas. Sorry, but cars with noise and horsepower will rule until gasoline is over $6.00. Ciao
Comment by jay pister on 2009-06-16


One of the main reasons that we have stayed with fossil fuels so long has been by governmental designs....The government can orchestrate the development of any areas of industry it wants to with by changing the direction of tax benefits....
What we need is an all out push by the government utilizing these tax incentives to develop and promote the use of green technologies...especially the electric car....This could go hand in hand with the use of both nuclear technology and the widespread usage of wind and solar technologies...

Comment by Allyn Moore on 2009-06-16
You should also mention Zap as they are an up and comming electric car company with deliveries to the military and a range of all electric cars and trucks.
Comment by Paul Maysonave on 2009-06-16
You neglected to mention zap who is shipping electric trucks ans cars NOW.
Comment by Julius Feinleib on 2009-06-16
What is the news from the EV battery developers, and who are they? This is the breakthrough key.

P.S. Don't blame "government" for voters not seeing the light of day. Sooner or later the "Gov." does what voters want when they out-shout the special interests.
Comment by John J Burton on 2009-06-16
Electric vehicles are a help in slowing up cimate change only to the extent (very small at present) that the electric utility generates its power from renewables.
Comment by Robert Branning on 2009-06-16
The vehicle that will start the electric revolution will be a small truck with capacitor battery system as well a platform for a solar panel
and also a platform for a wind turbines. put this all in one package with space in the box for groceries, sports equipment etc. That will satisfy the majority of people and and when up to speed will run alone on solar and wind.The batteries would only get the vehicle up to speed. GOODBYE OIL PRICES.
Comment by Gigantic J on 2009-06-16
He did mention ZAAP when he mentioned tesla motors. More importantly, why haven't we seen diesel hybrids. The VW TDI already get 55 mpg and with hybrid technology incorporated what would we see then. It confuses me that no one has jumped at this opportunity. I will buy the first diesel plug in hybrid that comes out.
Comment by Victor Victor on 2009-06-16
We have to stop the use of fossil fuel of any kind, and fossil fuels will be powering the current crop of hybrids. Picture 'hydrogen' stations as many and as widely dispersed as 'gas' stations. That will truly wean us away from fossil fuels. Yes the hydrogen infrastructure needs to be build, but that can be done, just as it was done for gasoline.
Comment by James Shapiro on 2009-06-16
So many are crying about the inability to get cars "big enough" for bigger people and bigger families. i.e. Joe Scarborough of Morning Joe. Yes, Razer(RZ) has created the elctric Hummer with up to 80 miles per gallon. They were supposed to show it to Congress. Now a company in England has crossed a Capstone(CPST) Microturbine engine with a hybrid in a Ford vehicle which seats 7 passengers, and is also good for 80 miles per gallon, and burns biodiesel. We are not far from solutions if we support these companies like Raser and Capstone/Ford. It is only a small piece of the technology in process. Let's move faster.
Comment by ross brigger on 2009-06-16
but here is the real question and where we can make the real money: Who is going to put up the electric charging stations that will be needed every 25-50 miles down each roadway?
Comment by Douglas Everson RN on 2009-06-16
Quiting Gas cars is like quiting smoking. It takes a long time to do so. When I first tried to quite smoking, after 15 years of puffing nicotine it cost me a small fortune. I would buy a pack of smokes and smoke one and then throw the rest away or hide them for future use.
That was ten years ago. Now I'm healthier, richer and less toxic to my Earth. I imagine quiting gas cars is like that time when I quite smoking. It will be very expensive to do and people's minds will think of all sorts of crazy things to say and to do to reason with continued use of gas cars. In truth, every American knows we can't continue to support our expensive oil habit, by having expensive and life robbing wars in the Middle East.
Moveover, people of America go out and buy a new gas less car and spread the word. If you find the person who is preaching gas less cars then you have found the Massiah.
Comment by Vern Pall on 2009-06-17
I own a Toyota Prius. It's the best car I've ever had. Electrics are the cars of the future. vp
Comment by Tom Caracciolo on 2009-06-17
I just sent the following to my Representative in Congress and the two U.S. Senators from my state of Washington regarding the additional $95 billion they will vote on for our military in the Mid East countries:

"Perhaps even a stronger reason for voting against the $95 billion because it is needed for healthcare is the need for the money elsewhere as follows:

Many of us know it but hardly any of us wants to express it. That is, the primary reason we are in Iraq or in any other Mid East country is because of oil. If we continue to stay in the Mid East Countries we will only continue our expensive use of foreign oil instead of converting to 85% Ethanol and Biodiesel for the next forty or so years while concurrently Hydrogen is fully developed to the point of completely replacing combustion engines. Since globally we have already reached and passed peak oil we cannot afford to keep on using oil until it is all gone and find ourselves without alternative fuels transportation. OUR ENTIRE NATION NEEDS TO TRANSITION TO ETHANOL AND BIODIESEL NOW. WE ARE ALREADY LATE IN DOING SO."
Comment by WILLIAM FORTUNE on 2009-06-17
Bill Rollins, PE, of New Boston, NH has a patent pending and has been working with the U.S. Dept. of Energy to convert coal directly to diesel fuel with electricity as a by-product. Potable water could be another by-product. DOE has reviewed the process and a power plant investor is in the process of having the technology verified by an independent lab. and is raising funds to build a power plant. The total energy output per ton of coal is much greater as opposed to burning the coal. CO2, as you know can be buried where it reacts with other elements to form new compounds. I think that the CO2 could be used to grow more algae or used in Valcent’s (OTCBB:VCTPF) vertical gardens to grow food or used to fight fire.

Coal gives more bang for the buck; there is more geothermal electricity coming on line in addition to other producers of electricity and natural gas. There will be more electric cars. Therefore, I think that it is time to stop investing in solar, wind and bio-fuels and look to the near future where we will not need to import much oil.

Also, I am trying to get a high speed material transport system developed that will greatly reduce the number of tractor trailers on the roads and increase our Nations productivity while reducing the need for diesel fuel. (I don’t see those golf-cart-sized cars on the roads with large trucks.)


Comment by Myron Martin on 2009-06-17
I find it very hard to get excited about electric cars, too much battery weight and size, far too limited mileage. I simply do not see them as cost effective.

Why not use hydraulic motors on each wheel, eliminate a transmission completely by controlling speed with a hydraulic pump driven by a small high efficiency diesel. I saw a proto type depicted in Popular Mechanics over 40 years ago and the simplicity and practicality beats the high cost of cumbersome limited range batteries.
Comment by Tom Badger on 2009-06-17
Though we are in developement of the first off shore wind energy system in America here in Rhode Island Just the thought of an electric car is frightening. Why? Here we have the hightest costs for electric in America and having an electric car would only make my electric meter spin like a top. I used to live in Spokane, Washington State where electric is 15 times cheaper because of hydro power electric cars would be great. Here the costs of recharging the batteries would be worse than 4 bucks per gallon.
Comment by Ricks on 2009-06-17
I found this be very interesting.
Comment by Patrick Jamaes Ladd on 2009-06-17
Powering cars with electricity only moves the goal posts. What is needed is a different game. Governments should have tied the obscene amounts of money given to the car manufacturers to the production of a hydrogen powered vehicle.The basic technology exists. Another Manhattan Project perhaps?
Comment by Bernard Fleet on 2009-06-17
The field of electric vehicles is, despite the economic malaise, growing at an exponential rate. The forecast is for between 1 to 4 million EVs on the roads by 2015. These will most probably be a mix of plug-in hybrids (sometimes also called extended range EVs) pure battery vehicles and a diminishing share of conventional hybrids. Fuel cell vehicles will, as always, be in the future. Apart from the OEMs that all have plans to launch an EV there are around 30-50 start-up EV companies. There is also the massive effort in China which may well be the world-leader in EVs. Exciting times for an industry that 5 years ago hardly existed.
Comment by TW on 2009-06-17
With so much of this nations electricity coming from coal fired power plants, are electric cars really green? Are we not just trading carbon from petroleum for carbon from coal? Oh yeah wind power and all that.. Last I heard is that we can only expect to get about 20% of what we need from that. Also, remember what happened to food prices when ethanol was the big thing. What effect will great holy gobs of electric cars, plugged into the power grid at night, have on the cost of a kilowatt hour?
Comment by Ed on 2009-06-17
If what I have been reading about algae is true we can get enough biofuel from it to provide fuel for all our energy needs, transportation and electricity.
Comment by Joe on 2009-06-17
RE: "Therefore, I think that it is time to stop investing in solar, wind and bio-fuels and look to the near future where we will not need to import much oil. "

You must be kidding, right? If you want to import less oil, we need to transition yesterday. What I mean by that is investing heavily in renewables so we're not so reliant upon fossil fuels. Which whether you want to admit it or not, are extremely harmful to the environment. Burying CO2 is a joke too. Until I see an economical solution there, it doesn't exist. Not to mention, what happens if the CO2 leaks out? That's a nice lawsuit waiting to happen. We need to get at least 50% of the daily passenger vehicles electric. We'll keep drilling domestically in the meantime, just to cover the transition time.

Oh, and stop using the "golf cart" argument. You know damn well most of the electric cars in development are NOT golf carts. I do agree that electric vehicles won't work for large trucks. For those, we should focus on natural gas.
Comment by Raymond Montanari on 2009-06-17
As a dealer of synthetic lubricants I have been in this war for 28 years. Extended drain intervalls of one year or more have been possible for that long. Shame on all those who change their oil at 3000 miles.
I have ageo-exchange heat/ac system and I just installed a 10kwh solae system on my home. We all need to do this. RM
Comment by Ewan Middlemiss on 2009-06-17
Here's a thought for a new holistic apprach to electric transportation. All the current solutions are focused on short distances and small cars. We need a focus on an integrated system to address long distance transpotation of goods and people over 200km per trip and more up to a 1000km at a time. Electric vehicles need to be based on a common design theme and controlling electronics that makes them all compatible with each other. Thus in suburbia where each needs to go their own way they can, but the minute you need to go national highways or interstate, they could all be hooked up together in a long train, probably on something similar to a rail track, or could utilise the existing rail infrastructure, or could have a new railstructure slowly implemented over the existing highway sytem. The benefits would be huge. CUt down rolling resistance and wind resistance through effective slipstreaming. Power could be fed in through the track system thereby eliminating the current pesky range problems. Downhill sections could be used for regenerative braking to make the whole system more efficient. And, no more accidents and snarl ups as the intelligent sysytem would know exactly what is happening at all points in the system and control it accordingly. And perhaps the biggest win would be the productivity saved. Like a train, your 6 to 10 hour road trip can be used for working/sleeping or just catching up on the latest ballgame/sitcom as you would only need to take control back of your vehicle when the system spat you out at your destination. I can think of several wrinkles that would need to be ironed out but none seem too difficult with current day technologies.
Comment by Joe on 2009-06-17
It is all just a big joke, I bought a diesel truck 3 years ago and had to drive quite a distance because one station after another quit carrying biodiesel I bought a diesel truck to support biodiesel and now none of the stations are carrying it.where is the ignorant EPA on this one? better fuel for the vehicle,better for the environment,and can be made out of just about any plant that has oil.
even fungus.

my 2 cents worth


Comment by Jeremy on 2009-06-18
Jeff, thanks for the article! I believe that PHEVs are the future if the US is going to make a serious dent in all of our oil imports and CO2 emmissions. I'm tentatively planning on purchasing the Chevy Volt, probably the 2nd year that it is out. It's 40 mile all electric range is plenty enough to take me back and forth to work every day, with about 15 miles to spare!

What about you? What do you guys drive? What are you planning on driving in the future? I think your readers would like to know.
Comment by tonyc on 2009-06-18
ALL buses and trucks and other large volume gasoline users should run on (US sourced) natural gas TODAY!! This will reduce usage of and increse prices for gasoline, and eventually provide real motivation to provide alternative fuel products for the small volume gasoline users (like individual cars)
Comment by kneworld on 2009-06-18
Why no mention in this article about BYD
Comment by Neil Farbstein on 2009-06-18
Whats the price of those batteries? They add tens of thousands of dollars to sticker price. Vulvox has developed a silicon nanowire lithium ion battery that can hold ten times the energy of the batteries that Coda is selling. We are working to develop a cheaper process to manufacture them.
http://vulvox.tripod.com
Comment by Ed Wolf on 2009-06-19
I've been saying for years, Hydrogen! It's been developed and available for years, and with no pollution. It would stop almost all of the pollution that go into our atmosphere.
I'm glad to see others are finally seeing this alternative. Just put tanks for hydrogen at practically all service stations.
I hope we don't spend too much time and money going after all these other alternatives.
Over 20 years ago a city, I think Salt Lake City, was running all of their city vehicles on hydrogen. I wonder if they still are?
Comment by Christoph on 2009-06-19
Zenn Motor Company in Canada has a new game changing dry battery technology from Texas for their Zero Emissions No Noise electric vehicles.
Comment by joseph stanley on 2009-06-21
Can you go to New York and back, then drive down to the Walmart, and then spin out to Jersy to see Auntie May in your brand new Coda? All at 80 mph of course.

Motoring is making massive strides of course. About 1955 Popular Mechanics promised a production electric car in about five years. We still await the results.

Does anyone remember the Chicago, Aurora, and Elgin, the Chicago North Shore, or the great Pacific Electric. Every city had an electric railway and they sometimes ran at 80 mph,hundreds of hp, and they never took a single "recharge". We scapped most of them and the few survivors were made unusable.Today they are "trying" to rebuild a few. What chance is there that the Coda will kill them off. Few and none I'd say.

Maybe the Coda will kill fewer people than a Cadallic, maybe it will cause less congestion, maybe it will compete in economy and comfort, and maybe it won't require a coal fired generating station to keep it clean and green.

But why be sceptical. Slow progress is better than none. Until now the automotive industry hasn't delivered either. It is getting what it well deserves!

A hundred years later- goodbye Coda, hello trains...

Joe
Comment by Jim Demetras on 2009-06-24
Diesel should get more attention. Diesel engines are 30 to 40% more efficient than gasoline besides being much safer and longer lasting. If all the cars on the road were diesels we would be using 30% less petroleum without really changing anything. (perhaps that's why the oil companies have kept diesel more expensive even though it is a cheaper product to make?) Already, almost all trucks and buses are diesel and many new buses are diesel hybrids. Some of these will go farther on a gallon of fuel than many SUVs.
Some years ago, Chrysler built a diese hybrid Intrepid that got 72 mpg but didn't put it into production. A big plus for diesel engines is that they will run on a variety of fuels such as straight vegetable oil or used frying oil than many people are now using. Vegetable oil can be produced from almost any vegetable product but corn and soy are not the best choices for level of productivity. Algae definitely looks, by far, the most promising but no one ever talks about this and only a few small start ups are working on it.
About hydrogen, where is all the hydrogen going to come from? I believe at this time it takes more energy to produce hydrogen from water than the fuel would supply. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Comment by Steve Males on 2009-06-25
Someone else referenced the Zenn Electric Car Company in Canada which has produced a small electric car for several years. The existing vehicle is licensed in most of the United States.

The important fact is Zenn's partnership with EEStor, a Texas company working on what will be the most revolutionary battery in the world. They claim to be within months of final testing and production.
Comment by Andrew Valdez on 2009-06-25
I would like an open discussion, positive or negative, concerning non-application of Raser Technology's already tested electric motor by auto companies, especialy since it has been manufactured and proven by FEVs.
Comment by David Rubin on 2009-07-07
No one here has mentioned the zinc air fuel cell. I think we'll all be caught with our pants down when Toyota releases their zinc air powered car now projected for 2020. The technology has been proven in tests run by the Lawrence Livermore labs as well as in Europe. Inherent costs are much lower than lithium based systems and do not use materials that are not commonly found.