Rate:
Share
Views: 3423
Text Size:

High Speed Rail

The Biggest Public Works Project in the U.S.

By Sam Hopkins
Thursday, June 11th, 2009

As of June 9, 2009, the largest public works project in the U.S. is a railroad tunnel.

$8 billion in federal stimulus funds are pouring into select high-speed rail projects like the Hudson River rail tunnel from New Jersey to New York City. . .

And the bucks disbursed by Washington make up just one part of a multi-billion dollar effort to update the nation's iron highways. The train is just now leaving the station. Are you on board?

Not Just New York

The New Jersey Transit's rail and bus lines take passengers on over 223 million trips a year. Nationally, ridership has been increasing not only on high-frequency commuter lines like NJ-NYC, but also between cities like Raleigh and Charlotte.

North Carolina's main Amtrak route runs you from point A to point B in about the same time it takes to drive. And when gasoline prices skyrocketed in 2008, the 170-mile Raleigh-Charlotte route saw a 28% jump over 2007 ticket sales.

To commuters, rail made more and more sense with every cent unleaded ticked upward.

But what if the same route took half the time by train as it did by car— and cost less?

That's the scenario in the making across the country's "mega-regions."

Mega-region is a term coined by Richard Florida, a transportation researcher who created an economic geography of the U.S. based partially on how lit up different areas are on nighttime satellite images.

The most heavily populated and economically vibrant mega-region is the Boston-Washington DC corridor known to many as the Megalopolis.

Advertisement

One double-digit gain per month...

Every Month...

Guaranteed!

Thanks to Obama's Alternative Energy Funding, we're now guaranteeing

no less than one double-digit gain per month.

Click here before the next one is released!




Nationwide, mega-regions like the ones stretching from Chicago to Kansas City and from San Diego up to Sacramento account for 3/4 of American economic activity. Check out this Department of Transportation map to see what I mean:

high speed rail network


High-speed rail would lessen commute times between close-together cities like Washington and Baltimore, and it would let business travelers get from Boston's city center to the nation's capital in under 3 hours.

Baseball fans in Baltimore know the bittersweet boost the local economy gets each year from Amtrak, as Red Sox and Yankees fans flood down for games against the Orioles. It turns out that it's cheaper for Boston and New York natives to catch the train down and catch a game than it is to buy a ballpark seat in their hometowns!

Going Back to Cali

Some of the security hassles of air travel may be replicated as rail lines get more packed, but times to and from far-flung airports would be eliminated. What's more, you can book a train ticket for a reasonable price at any train station and often without an attendant. There's no comparison when it comes to the run-around.

There's also a huge savings to be had at the state level, as California makes clear.

California's state government says a statewide high-speed rail network would eliminate the need for 5 runways and 90 boarding gates to be built by 2020, and construction crews alone would employ 160,000 workers.

By 2035, all jobs associated with expanding railway infrastructure in the Golden State could come to 450,000!

That's in addition to saving on traffic congestion, pollution, and health care costs for citizens (3000 lane-miles of freeway would also be cut out by rail), and creating a billion dollars in revenue surplus for Sacramento, where state legislators are perennially locked in budget strife.

You know what, though? It's right to doubt the government's ability to get rail done right.

The 'Big Dig' Bogeyman

As some politicians in Washington push for an "all of the above" approach to energy that includes more oil drilling in the U.S., do they also stand behind giving Americans the best options in efficient intercity travel?

Boston's "Big Dig" highway project became a laughing stock for time and cost overruns in a government-led project. The boondoggle even cost a life when temporary patchwork crushed a vehicle.

NJ Transit doesn't want the ARC (Access to the Region's Core) tunnel to become "Big Dig, Part 2." And in the southern part of the state, we're seeing an example of how rail projects can grow from more than one root.

The Delaware River Port Authority (DRPA) failed to get approval recently for its own diesel-fuel light-rail line towards Philadelphia's New Jersey suburbs.

DRPA couldn't get stimulus funding because the project didn't meet federal criteria on "ridership, cost-effectiveness, and commuter time savings."

"It's extremely difficult to meet the marks they put down," DRPA CEO John Matheussen told the port authority board.

How many proposals like DRPA's from around the country get federal funding, according to the CEO? Only 2 out of every 100 projects. That leaves room for states to act more quickly, he says, which can bring a time and cost advantage as the race for regional high-speed rail heats up.

We're tracking companies like ABB (NYSE:ABB), which has played a major role in creating light-rail systems around the world.

Next week, a look at what other countries are already doing with high-speed.

What's your experience with rail travel, and how do you think the U.S. should move forward on the issue?

Let us know in the comments below.

Regards,

sig
Sam Hopkins


Editor's Note: From solar and wind to geothermal and biofuels, Green Chip readers want to know which renewable energy resource will take over where fossil fuels leave off. The answer is...all of the above!

There is no one single solution to today's energy crisis. However, the combination of all viable renewable energy resources, coupled with energy efficiency, conservation and smart grid development will not only lead us to energy independence and a cleaner, more sustainable energy infrastructure — but also to what will soon prove to be the greatest investment opportunity of the 21st Century.







Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (19 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by Philip Shane on 2009-06-11
In Chicago's case it would be more practical and cost effective to put a high speed monorail system down the middle of Interstates I-55, I-57, and I-88 from about 40 miles out. In the case of I-55, a monorail from Joliet to Chicago would save considerable commute time, avoid traffic delays, save fuel, and save lives. Why put a high speed rail in that follows the interstate through farm country? The biggest problem with any of these systems will be on how to distribute the people once they reach the end point of the rail.
Comment by Brek on 2009-06-11
Rail is the future as energy costs explode. Rail is the most efficent way to move goods over land.
I am in Los Angeles and took the metro train in to Union Station then hopped on LA's small subway. Everything went smooth and didn't have to deal with parking. A word to the wise, if you drive to LA READ every parking sign or you will have a hefty ticket or be getting your car out of impound.
The train is great, there were even electrical outlets by some of the seats.
As I rode the train I looked for real estate near a station. There was some for sale and at this point probably doesn't carry any premium for being near a station.
Comment by Stephanie Ince on 2009-06-11
I love high speed rail. One actual experience: Japan 1965. I can't believe how backward this country is. I would use rail for everything, can't use airplanes because of back problems. Hence, I never travel. But I'd love to. Tourism would get a huge boost from older people. We'd go everywhere.
Comment by FATRAIL on 2009-06-11
FAT RAIL IS THE ANSWER. HEAVYDUTY LOCKING RAILS SET AT 8FT APART FOR HIGHSPEED COMMUTERS. ABOVE GROUND IN THE BURBS AND COUNTRY, BELOW GROUND OR ON ELEVATED TRACKS IN THE CITY'S LIKE CHICAGO L OR A SUBWAY. INROUTE SERVICE TO BE SIMILAR TO INFLIGHT SERVICE. IMAGINE KICKING BACK AND DRINKING COFFEE, READING THE PAPER -AND- GOING THRU YOUR EMAIL ON YOUR MORNING COMMUTE... DUH, WHO WOULDN'T GO FOR THAT VERSUS THE TRAFFIC JAM AND FREEWAY HELL... BUILD IT AND THEY WILL COME!
Comment by Kenneth Stahl on 2009-06-12
Readers of this newsletter should examine Alan S. Drake and his essays on rail. did you know for example that in 1973, the Department of Defense had an emergency plan to electrify 18,000 miles of U.S. rail? One essay in particular is Multiple Birds, One Silver Bullet. While I am on the this subject, it is interesting to note that you cannot take a train south from Portland to Los Angeles. You can only as far as Sacramento. I think it is high that was fixed!
Comment by WB on 2009-06-12
Before rushing out and starting to build a system that will be quickly out of date, I hope they move in the direction of maglev incorporating superconductor technology, something no other country has developed yet, and use the superconducting transit lines for the dual purpose of electrical power distrubution. With a huge project that will take alot of money and time to build, it pays to start out on a solid foundation for the future, rather than make haste to build something that will be obsolete before it's time.
Comment by M Wakefield on 2009-06-12
All the US would be doing is getting to the level of Japan, Europe and most of the rest of the non 3rd world is railways. Better 25 years late than never I suppose.
Comment by H.D. on 2009-06-12
After positive experiences traveling by rail Europe (pleasure only)and from here in Maine to Boston,the more opportunites to travel by rail the better,especially highspeed.I agree w/the previous respondent w/ regards to maglev technology,seems like a no-brainer especially if you incorporate the delivery of other commodity services. Check out the Hydrogen Superhighway site for a fantastic,futuristic concept on how it could be incorporated.
Comment by Gerald Sprayberry on 2009-06-12
Good Article!!

I have wondered why the politicians don't seem to understand that all airlines [mostly] have been outdated [for domestic transportation] for decades; yet, still spending/enlarging airports..
High Speed Rail [MAGLEV] would SOLVE Many Problems.
Comment by joseph miller on 2009-06-12
Truly "high speed" rail that is clean cheap safe and fast could be a real benefit if its economical and could also easily carry light freight. I have wondered why places like japan and france have and us has not.
Comment by Justwatching on 2009-06-12
I have been to Europe and their electric rail system is working well.
We had the oportunity to do the same here in the late 40's but money and politics got in the way and G.M. killed all electric transportation from autumobles to trains and trollies in favor of the I.C.E. You have my vote to electrify and restore the entire train system.
Comment by Justwatching on 2009-06-12
We don't need to reinvent the electric train head, we can order all we want from the existing manufacturing facility in Southern Russia. That is where most of Europe gets theirs. I have seen the factory and ridden on the trains.
Together we can restore our great U.S.A.
Learn from the success of others.
Comment by Joe Jackson on 2009-06-13
I think high speed rail is long overdue in the US. Having high speed rail would solve a lot of our transportation problems and create a more healthy environment with less autos, trucks on the road. Not to mention the frustration of having to wait in lines, long commutes to and from airports, and spiraling ticket prices.
Comment by Deschuyteneer M.R. on 2009-06-19
You guys there in the US should look a little bit more to the old continent let me remaind you that France holds the world record with his high speed train with over 360km an hour and that is over 240 miles an hour.
Comment by joe hardcastle on 2009-08-21
The standard width of rail tracks has not been changed for ages. It needs to be widened for high speed trains. Also wood railroad ties must be replaced by steel, our steel mills are idle. Wider rails mean safe trains which I would ride.