Current Rating:
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (6 votes)
Rate this Article Views: 1319
printer friendly Font Size: Small | Medium | Large

Green Hotels

Green Travel Trends, Pt. 2

By Sam Hopkins
Thursday, June 5th, 2008

First off this week, I want to thank those of you who put your two cents in about my column on energy efficient transportation and how higher oil prices are squeezing companies and consumers alike.

I love to see comments like the one here from Captain Lindsey Powell, who flies a Boeing 757 for a living. Lindsey gave us a pilot's-eye-view on air travel, with the most current numbers you'll find.

"As a Captain of a Boeing 757, this week I flew 180 people from Washington to LAX. We burned 26,000 pounds of fuel (3,800 gallons) at a cost of about $14,000 total fuel bill. This equates to $78 per person for fuel. Another $1 per gallon would add another $21 per person each way on this full flight.

Compare this to driving the 2600 miles alone, you would have to get over 100 mpg to burn the same 21 gallons per person.

It's still an efficient, albeit stressful, way of travel."

Thank you so much for your input, Lindsey. It's one thing to write about market movements, but it's quite another to get the scoop from the cockpit.

If you want to make a point about a Green Chip Review article that hits close to home, please avail yourself of the "Comment on this Article" link right at the bottom of this page.

Now, on to this week's topic: green hotels... where we look at travel from a different angle.

The Push Toward Green, Energy Efficient Hotels

If taking a vacation meant nothing but traveling, no one would go. Time spent in on plains, trains and automobiles takes its toll on the body and mind, and by the time you get from point A to point B you just want to kick back and relax.

But the fact is that even when you're lounging around on the beach or sweating out your stress at a spa, energy plays a role in your holiday.

Like airlines, hotel chains are facing stiff headwinds.

  • Consumer confidence is down and fuel costs make vacations prohibitively expensive for many
  • Energy costs for facilities—especially ones with low occupancy—are squeezing margins

Oppenheimer Funds just downgraded three major hotel chains based on the above factors and relatively weak international growth to balance a U.S. slowdown.

Marriott International (NYSE:MAR), Choice Hotels International (NYSE:CHH), and InterContinental Hotels (NYSE:IHG) were all moved from "outperform" to "perform" on June 4.

So in the near term, these companies' stock prices may trade within a range dictated by how well they can surmount profit obstacles. The long-term picture is good, though, for ones that establish comparative advantage in energy and water efficiency.

Going Green: Why Every Water Drop Counts in Hotels 

If you've stayed in a hotel recently, you may have seen a new note hanging next to the classic "Do not disturb" tag.

Many major hotel chains are now gently encouraging guests to reuse towels to cut down on water for laundry use. If a towel is too soiled to reuse, toss it on the floor. If not, hang it on the door to dry.

Hotels are also purchasing front-loading washing machines, which use 40% to 60% less water and between 30% and 50% less energy than top-loaders.

You can imagine the reduced headache this leads to for resort managers in U.S. dry spots like Las Vegas, and internationally at Dead Sea resorts in Jordan and Israel.

Though Memorial Day travel volume seemed robust here on the American east coast, the colliding threats of recession and inflation mean the time to make efficiency investments and stay competitive is now.

Marriott International has plans to reduce energy and water usage at its hotels and resorts by 25% in coming years. Marriott is also installing solar power units at 40 of its hotels, with more such improvements to follow.

Outside the suites, Marriott inked a deal in April with Brazil's Amazonas Sustainable Fund to donate $2 million for the protection of 1.4 million acres of rainforest.

That points to a separate but important effort by executives to appeal to green consumers. by building a brand tied to corporate social responsibility.

There are also a plethora of smaller hotels that, being more nimble and not having to roll out efficiency measures or buy devices for dozens of buildings, have joined the Green Hotels Association to tie travel to a zero-carbon lifestyle.

You can find a list of these hotels, motels, and other inns at www.greenhotels.com.

As for the big boys and stock buys, Marriott (NYSE:MAR) looks appetizing right now considering its efficiency enhancements. It's trading near three-year support levels just above $30, and even though Marriott's Q2 revenue-per-room forecast was recently revised downwards by 2-3%, we should see recovery by 2010.

What are you looking for in green travel trends? Let us know.

Happy trails to you,

sig

Sam Hopkins

P.S. - In the Green Chip International portfolio we're not just looking at energy producers but companies that play smart with power, in travel, food, or whatever industry you can think of. Fact is, energy prices impact it all, and first movers will be the ones who survive the shakeout. To learn more, join GCI today


Green Chip Review: A new way of life... a new generation of wealth
Jeff Siegel on CNBC
Green Chip Stocks Editor Jeff Siegel, featured guest on CNBC's Green Week

Your Privacy is Assured.

Get the inside track on the most lucrative stock plays in today's scorching-hot alternative and renewable energy markets.

Sign up for the FREE Green Chip Review daily e-Letter from alternative energy expert Jeff Siegel.

Please Enter Your E-mail:






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (6 votes)

Comment on this Article  |   Digg this | Post to del.icio.us | Reddit


Comments:

Comment by Ray on 2008-06-06
Concerning the efficiency of flying a Boeing 757: The comparison, as made, was incomplete and unfair. First, most people who drive long distances go with companions or family members, making the per-person cost much lower. Second, the author ignored all the related costs of flying: The cost of getting to and from the airports, cost of parking, the cost of the staff working at the airport and on the plane (and the cost of getting them to work,) and the cost of the airport and parking infrastructure and its maintenance, as well as the intense maintenance of the planes. When all these things are factored in, the comparison shifts significantly toward being more favorable for driving than for flying.

Comment by CA Seiler on 2008-06-06
Greetings,

I travel a great deal and can tell you that Marriott has had the door hanger (actually, notice on your pillow and bathroom) concerning reuse of towels, etc., for several years, as have several other chain hotels.

I realize you will think me a neanderthal, but I believe this whole "man-made" global warming thing is all bunk. However,I'm not totally stupid,so I continue to invest in all this crazyness (might as well make some money off of this mania) even though I believe some of it (ie, ethanol and bio fuels) hurts us more than it helps us. If, instead, we could get all the politically- and environmetally-correct loons to allow us to drill, drill now and save money (ala Newt) we could solve most of our fuel problems!

And, as for flying vs driving, I never fly on any journey under 400-450 miles. Moreover, again this year as I have done for the past ten summers, I plan to drive more than 5000 miles this summer regardless of the price of gas. And, yes, I own a big, powerful automobile that only gives me 22 mpg on the highway. (I also have a bicycle for close to home running around and to give the crazies a few grins)

Chow ... CA