Green Chip Stocks

Green Chip Stocks Index:

ABB (ABB) - 22.96 ↑ 0.19

Canadian Solar (CSIQ) - 37.48 ↑ 2.04

Capstone Turbine (CPST) - 1.23 -0.02

Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) - 679.70 ↑ 1.05

Daqo New Energy (DQ) - 34.84 -0.56

First Solar (FSLR) - 69.57 -0.11

General Electric (GE) - 25.84 -0.14

Hannon Armstrong (HASI) - 14.47 -0.02

Hanwha SolarOne (HSOL) - 2.19 ↑ 0.00

JA Solar (JASO) - 9.42 ↑ 0.17

Maxwell Technologies (MXWL) - 10.31 ↑ 0.04

NRG, Inc. (NRG) - 30.31 -0.47

NRG Yield, Inc. (NYLD) - 52.97 -1.42

Ormat (ORA) - 27.50 -0.03

Pattern Energy Group (PEGI) - 31.88 -0.36

SolarCity (SCTY) - 67.31 -1.37

SunEdison (SUNE) - 21.34 -0.69

SunPower (SPWR) - 38.40 ↑ 0.18

TerraForm Power (TERP) - 31.52 ↑ 0.28

Tesla (TSLA) - 283.20 ↑ 13.50

TransAlta Renewables, Inc. (RNW) - 11.34 ↑ 0.00

Trina Solar (TSL) - 13.29 ↑ 0.76

U.S. Geothermal (HTM) - 0.60 ↑ 0.00

Whole Foods Market (WFM) - 39.04 -0.11

Yingli Green Energy (YGE) - 3.41 ↑ 0.05

Energy Efficiency Investing

How Energy Efficiency Can Replace Nuclear Power

By R.T. Jones   

Is energy efficiency more cost effective and better for the economy than replacing nuclear power plants?

The folks over at Energy Savvy seem to think so. And they do a damn good job at backing up their argument, crunching the numbers and offering the following. . .

In this comparison, a new nuclear power plant is expected to last 40 years and produce at the U.S. average of 12.3 billion kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year. The levelized cost of electricity for a new nuclear plant that we’re using is 8.4 cents per kWh, which includes the cost of financing, building and operating the plant for 40 years. The total cost for this plant and its power for 40 years is $41 billion.

Instead, if you want to retrofit enough houses to eliminate the need for 12.3 billion kWh per year, the calculation works like this: A typical electrically heated U.S. home uses 20,000 kWh per year, which can be reduced by 30% with a $12,000 energy retrofit, based on various industry estimates.

You’d need to retrofit just over 1.6 million homes to equal the entire annual energy production of a nuclear power plant, for a total cost of just under $20 billion. Home energy efficiency improvements in electrically heated homes include upgrading the efficiency of the electric heating system, insulating and making air sealing improvements to the home’s building envelope, using solar hot water heating systems and replacing inefficient A/C units and appliances.

Job creation, in each case, looks like this: At peak construction, building a nuclear power plant would employ as many as 2,400 workers, eventually leveling out at around 400 to 700 long-term employees. For the home retrofits: According to Matt Golden, Policy Chair for Efficiency First, retrofitting 1,600,000 homes in a year would create roughly 220,000 jobs.

Good stuff!

They even put together this infographic that I strongly recommend you share with others.

nucinfo

Enjoy this article? Get more in our Free Newsletter

Jeff Siegel on CNBC
Green Chip Stocks Editor Jeff Siegel, featured guest on CNBC's Green Week

Your Privacy is Assured.

Get the inside track on the most lucrative stock plays in today's scorching-hot alternative and renewable energy markets.

Sign up for the FREE Energy and Capital daily e-Letter from alternative energy experts Jeff Siegel and Nick Hodge. We'll also send you our latest report on Wind Investing straight to your inbox.

Please Enter Your E-mail:




Related Articles

UK Nuclear Debate
UK residents are unhappy about a proposed nuclear dump in their backyard.

Thorium Investment Opportunities
Is thorium a safer alternative to nuclear fuel?

Nuclear Safety Questioned by Federal Court
Federal court calls for changes in nuclear fuel storage.