Rate:
Share
Views: 4110
Text Size:

U.S. Corn Ethanol Outlook

U.S. Corn Ethanol Industry on the Ropes

By Sam Hopkins
Friday, April 17th, 2009

U.S. corn ethanol's on the ropes.

The problems start with water.

That's because domestic corn-based ethanol requires between 3 and 4.2 gallons of water for each gallon of fuel output, depending on whose numbers you trust.

Of course, the domestic ethanol industry gives the more favorable 3-to-1 ratio. Other number crunchers—some of them paid by fossil fuel interests—say the amount of H2O it takes to produce the top American biofuel is too high to justify.

"We're definitely looking at something where the cure may be worse than the disease," said one representative of the industry group Ceres, whose research focus is highlighting the potential economic harm of transitioning to renewable energy.

The real problem, though, is that ethanol is a political "maybe" in an era of decisive and broad government initiatives. Why?

The answer is that, on a worldwide scale, U.S. ethanol is in a sort of confused adolescence. It's not a newborn anymore, but it's still far from full adulthood.

From 6.5 billion gallons in 2007, the U.S. ethanol industry churned out 9 billion gallons of the biofuel in 2008. That's 52% of the world's ethanol production, but still most American motorists aren't able to put ethanol in their tanks.

That's a huge disconnect. Fortunately there's a better alternative...

Advertisement

Have You Closed 40 Winners this Year?

We have!

And we've done it by exploiting a newly-developed "profit machine" that's delivered

40 winning trades in 37 weeks!

Learn how the "machine" works. . . and how you can be in on number 41. . .


Sugar Ethanol Sweetens While Corn Ethanol Sours

On the other end of the ethanol spectrum, nearly 90% of the cars sold in Brazil can run on a flex-fuel mix of sugarcane ethanol and refined petroleum.

From humble beginnings during the 1970s oil shock, sugar ethanol outsold gasoline in Brazil last year. The sweet fuel is not only homegrown, it's also cheaper. That's not the case in most U.S. regions, where filling up with corn ethanol blends only becomes economical at astronomical gasoline prices.

Corn ethanol boosters hope for 15 billion gallons of domestic ethanol production per year by 2015, but that assumes continuous funding access and public enthusiasm...

Both are sorely lacking.

Publicly-listed U.S. ethanol producers are coming into the harsh light of the recession as energy prices plummeted and investor optimism on the domestic market cools.

Just in the past month, Illinois ethanol producer Aventine filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. 

Pacific Ethanol (NASDAQ:PEIX) execs recently told investors (including Bill Gates) that it doesn't expect to make it through April, and more companies are looking shaky. PEIX in fact now trades for under 50 cents a share.

Thing is, a lot of firms like Pacific Ethanol and Aventine enjoyed nice market returns for a while.

But they couldn't hang in tough times.

Between market realities and political positioning, corn ethanol falls through the cracks.

The Regional Water Advantage

American auto makers are inching towards a higher proportion of domestic sales of vehicles that will run on E85 and other blends, but as with so many of Detroit's troubles, it may be a case of too little, too late.

We are seeing movement towards more aggressive competition within the U.S. biofuel industry. As weaker companies fail, it's clear that tacking "ethanol" onto a company's name is not the Midas touch.

Regional competition within the U.S. is also picking up, with water as a key differentiating factor between geographies.

The journal Environmental Science and Technology is showcasing a study this month that Midwestern ethanol production is easier on water resources than biofuel produced in the western U.S.

The University of Minnesota study finds that ethanol produced in California uses 2,100 gallons of water per gallon of ethanol!

Minnesota uses 96 gallons of water in similar processing facilities.

Brazil tops all the U.S. states, with the Brazilian Agricultural Research Cooperation agency rating sugar cane crops as Level 1: Zero Impact.

Climate and government initiatives combine to make Brazil the optimal ethanol environment. Some Southern U.S. states like Louisiana can grow cane in similar conditions, but the damage has been done to the corn-heavy domestic investment landscape and public opinion.

Geography matters when it comes to ethanol investing, and all renewable energy forecasts, for that matter.

That's why we like the Market Vectors Global Alternative Energy ETF (NYSE:GEX), which allows you to take a worldwide approach to your clean energy profits. 

GEX is up 24% in the past month.

I'll fill you in with all the latest data and investment opportunities from Brazil next week as I take part in the Renewable Energy Finance Forum.

Regards,

sig

Sam Hopkins

PS. GEX may give you broad exposure to the cleantech industry, but Green Chip International will guide you every step of the way. . .giving you members-only updates when it's time to pounce on the hottest cleantech plays around.  We've cashed-out of several winning positions in the past few weeks, but many more are on the way.  Click here to take part in the green energy gold rush.


Editor's Note: From solar and wind to geothermal and biofuels, Green Chip readers want to know which renewable energy resource will take over where fossil fuels leave off. The answer is...all of the above!

There is no one single solution to today's energy crisis. However, the combination of all viable renewable energy resources, coupled with energy efficiency, conservation and smart grid development will not only lead us to energy independence and a cleaner, more sustainable energy infrastructure — but also to what will soon prove to be the greatest investment opportunity of the 21st Century.







Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (19 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by Art on 2009-04-17
Thanks for the informative article on the slummping Ethanol Markets. As you stated, some of the Domestic Ethanol companies are in trouble, except one. GreenPlains Renewable Energy, is the largest pure play Ethanol Producer in the US, is profitable and growing. It would be great to see someone report on the one very successful company in the space, that hasn't seen any of the problems you and others contuinuely comment on.

Thanks.
Comment by jerry verducci on 2009-04-17
Sam; Your absolutely 'right on' with your article. In regards to algae though, many are believing that the ' enclosed system' of growth/extraction, will be able to deliver the goods. It won't, because it involves to many moving parts and infrastructure to be replaced on a 24/7 basis.The 'Open Pond' extraction tecnique and will be the only viable way to procure an liqued fuel commercially. There will be problems however, developing a species that is more flexible and not injurious to the ' open pond' criteria,with an placement alongside a viable food source like coal fired plants, brackish water, all sewage and wastewater collection areas, relative to natural conditions longitude/ latitude specifically. Otherwise, we are back to electric being supplied by wind, solar and nuclear which as far as I am concerned will be late to the party and very costly to implement.No one listened 40 years ago when my doctors(phd's in environmental science,biology and zoology)predictions have all come true with one exception, the pandemic. And when climate change really begins in earnest(like NOW)the consequences alone from the slightest interaction or mutations of specie movement from one terrain or habitat to the other, will bring us the greatest threat to our existence. It will make " the day the earth stood still" a similar reality. Take the $$$ from the major oil companys new drilling off our coasts, and put it toward extraction of algae..period. Thanks-jerry verducci
Comment by Dick Deininger on 2009-04-17
Corn ethanol is the WRONG WAY to create biofuel. Aside from the water use, it takes 25% more energy to produce a gallon of ethanol than you get out of it. Secondly, you get 15% lower fuel economy than with out flex fuel. That adds up to 40% less efficiency and much greater pollution per gallon of fuel. I fully support green revolution and corn ethanol is not the way to get there. Let's stop wasting $ and time on the lost leader and get on with better hybrids including all the technology that goes with them I drive two hybrids.
Comment by Ivan Hills on 2009-04-18
At last! Recognition that ethanol from corn is a dumb idea. Ethanol from sucrose is practical, as Brazil has demonstrated for years. During 1945-7 I ran my vehicles on various fuels -- JAP racing fuel (80% ethanol, 20% methanol) -- 50/50 benzene and ethanol, similarly with a toluene or xylene/ethanol mixture. A spoonful of castor oil per gallon provided upper cylinder lubricant for straight alcohol fuel. Engines were always adjusted to suit the fuel. A very high compression engine runs well on straight ethanol and that is the best way if we are to use the stuff. Otherwise stay with 100% gasoline. Now a federal idiot wants ethanol in diesel fuel. That will finish my 30 year-old marine engine. Engine failure at sea can cause fatalities. Law suites, anyone?
Comment by b straub on 2009-04-18
Ethanol from corn is a stupid idea! Lets take the one food product that is put into just about everything we eat and drink and make it into our fuel source, how stupid! Not to mention that its energy cumsumption (diesel, water and soil) while processing the corn is about 3-1. Switch grass on the other hand grows everwhere and twice as fast as corn. It also requires far less energy to produce and refine into ethanol fuels. I guess taking a weed and turning it into our future fuel is'nt the most profitable, is that why you never hear about it?
Comment by b. clark on 2009-04-18
No one has even mentioned the fact the fuel with ethanol absolutely ruins the motors on small engines, such as lawnmowers, weedeatwers, and chainsaws. Leave it to the greenies and bureaucrats to screw things up.
Comment by John Adam on 2009-04-20
You can grow it as far North as Canada. Kentucky produced over a million gallons of molasses from sweet sorghum in 1899. China and India are starting to grow SWEET Sorghum for ethanol production. It requires much less water and chemicals than corn or sugar cane to grow it. You squeeze the sugars from the plant and feed the waste to cattle. Corn starch requires energy to cook to produce sugar. SWEET Sorghum sugars like sugar cane sugars do not require this step. Google Sweet Sorghum to verify what I have said.
Comment by Ezra Duong-Van on 2009-04-20
David Pimental, a leading Cornell University agricultural expert, has calculated that powering the average U.S. automobile for one year on ethanol (blended with gasoline) derived from corn would require 11 acres of farmland, the same space needed to grow a year's supply of food for seven people. Adding up the energy costs of corn production and its... Read More conversion into ethanol, 131,000 BTUs are needed to make one gallon of ethanol. One gallon of ethanol has an energy value of only 77,000 BTUS. Thus, 70 percent more energy is required to produce ethanol than the energy that actually is in it. Every time you make one gallon of ethanol, there is a net energy loss of 54,000 BTUs.
Comment by Sam Hopkins on 2009-04-21
It certainly seems that this article pushed a lot of buttons, and that many people have personal experiences with biofuel blends throughout the past several decades. Let's keep the dialogue going as I report from Brazil on sugar ethanol's potential!
Comment by Prabhakar Bhandarkar on 2009-04-30
Very correct.Sugar & Alcohol industry is entirely in the hands of Polticians.Their presence in running and policying the govt.ensures all kinds of sops/subsidies so that they make the money and get reacher day by day.In India most of the sugar and alcohol units are owned by the politicians and their affiliates.Infact getting a ticket for elections needs active involvement of candidate in this sector. Govt. funds sanctioned for planting Jetropha trees to feed nonedible oil as feedstock for Bio Diesel units has also vanished in the politicians constituencies and nothing is going to come out of it.
Comment by Donna Grafel on 2009-05-05
Corn ethanol isn't the villain the media has made it out to be. It is simply the bridge to the advanced biofuels that will one day replace it.
It won't be switch grass! Switch grass was a catchy phrase in a presidential speech to promote renewable resources. The cellulosic enzymes still need a lot of work. We are only at the pilot plant stage. The logistics just don't add up. Just how many acres of switch grass will it take to feed a cellulosic ethanol plant? How do you transport and store the one ton bales of grass which can only be cut once a year for each field planted. Switch grass is completely impractical as a feed stock for ethanol production.
As for water consumption: Think about these numbers-9.3 gallons of water to produce 1 can of vegetables, 44 gallons for 1 gallon of refined crude, 1500 gallons for one barrel of beer, 2075 gallons for 4 tires and 107,000 for the average use in a home in one year. And for those of you who golf, about 680,000 gallons of water for irrigating 1 acre of a golf course per year - and don't tell me you don't use any of these. The water consumption critique needs to be applied across the board and then we need to invest in water infrastructure.
Mr. Hopkins, instead of rambling on about Brazilian ethanol, corn ethanol, and switch grass I would like to challenge you to present usable information about the waste to energy technologies, the latest advances in algae to biodiesel. Dig out some new prospects on the bulletin boards and evaluate their potential!
Comment by Wilbur DeHart on 2009-05-07
It boggles my mind that corn ethanol tops molasses ethanol. Corn depletes the soil- molasses does not. Corn will not grow in places where molasses does. Corn must be turned into sugar before distillation starts--molasses is already sugar. Corn is a staple for food--molasses much less so. Hungry people cannot out bid a corn-to-ethanol company.
The corn lobby is the culprit. What could be more stupid?