Green Chip Stocks

Green Chip Stocks Index:

ABB (ABB) - 23.79 ↑ 0.36

Canadian Solar (CSIQ) - 28.28 -0.37

Capstone Turbine (CPST) - 1.44 ↑ 0.06

Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG) - 661.27 ↑ 1.50

Daqo New Energy (DQ) - 24.80 -1.71

First Solar (FSLR) - 62.81 -0.66

General Electric (GE) - 25.91 -0.11

Hannon Armstrong (HASI) - 14.45 -0.05

Hanwha SolarOne (HSOL) - 2.28 -0.07

JA Solar (JASO) - 9.55 -0.05

Maxwell Technologies (MXWL) - 12.65 -0.26

NRG, Inc. (NRG) - 31.58 ↑ 0.19

NRG Yield, Inc. (NYLD) - 54.38 ↑ 2.73

Ormat (ORA) - 27.08 -0.43

Pattern Energy Group (PEGI) - 33.67 -0.52

SolarCity (SCTY) - 69.42 -0.29

SunEdison (SUNE) - 21.66 -0.72

SunPower (SPWR) - 38.66 -0.37

TerraForm Power (TERP) - 33.05 ↑ 0.02

Tesla (TSLA) - 222.49 ↑ 2.91

TransAlta Renewables, Inc. (RNW) - 11.34 ↑ 0.00

Trina Solar (TSL) - 11.25 -0.06

U.S. Geothermal (HTM) - 0.70 ↑ 0.03

Whole Foods Market (WFM) - 36.85 ↑ 0.00

Yingli Green Energy (YGE) - 3.56 ↑ 0.11

Climate Policy Falls Short

Cap and Trade Impedes Technology Innovation

By Brianna Panzica   

Cap and trade programs (CTPs) have been widely accepted as a way to reduce pollution emissions by requiring companies to obtain trades, or emission permits, to be allowed to emit pollutants. The emissions have a cap, or a limit to pollution.

But these CTPs might not actually be the best way to lower emissions and prevent climate change.

According to a study by Margaret Taylor of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, these CTPs produce little to no incentives for technology innovation.

Taylor studied two CTPs, Title IV of the 1990 Clean Air Act, which controlled sulfur dioxide, and the Ozone Transport Commission/NOx Budget Program, which controls nitrogen oxide, and their relationships with innovation.

She found that there is less incentive for innovation when targets are set too low, which happened in both cases. 

Since companies were able to reduce emissions more cheaply than expected, they had a surplus of allowances, keeping allowance prices down.

And yet despite the abundance of allowances and the low prices, the CTP policies were not adjusted.

But many companies cut investments in clean technology since it wasn’t necessary for them to meet CTP goals.

At the same time, clean energy research and development slowed since the market for products shrunk.

Taylor writes in her report:

“The implication is that CTPs do not inherently provide sustained incentives for private sector R&D investments in clean technologies, but may add to the uncertainty inherent in inventive activity.”

It seems evident from her research that not only are CTPs not helping with clean tech innovation, but they are actually inhibiting it.

If the renewable market is to expand, CTPs must be adjusted or take a new direction entirely.

Enjoy this article? Get more in our Free Newsletter

Jeff Siegel on CNBC
Green Chip Stocks Editor Jeff Siegel, featured guest on CNBC's Green Week

Your Privacy is Assured.

Get the inside track on the most lucrative stock plays in today's scorching-hot alternative and renewable energy markets.

Sign up for the FREE Energy and Capital daily e-Letter from alternative energy experts Jeff Siegel and Nick Hodge. We'll also send you our latest report on Wind Investing straight to your inbox.

Please Enter Your E-mail:




Related Articles

Investors Demand Disclosure
A new wave of oil and gas company shareholders is demanding disclosure on environmental risks

Germany Embraces Climate Change Fight
Today's alternative energy progress is a direct result of Germany's early push for sustainability.

Secret Tar Sands Memo
Check out this confidential memo intended for the federal government's top bureaucrat.

Another Shortsighted Climate Goal Study
UK relying on natural gas for its future power generation needs is, for lack of a better word, stupid.