Clean Energy in the Emerging Markets

Third World to U.S: See Ya Later, Suckers

By
Thursday, July 1st, 2010

I took two days this week to travel to New York, where I attended the Euromoney Renewable Energy Finance Forum - Wall Street for the fourth time.

The main take-away was this: The U.S. is severely at risk of losing its economic superiority to developing nations.

Here's why...

Leap-frogging the laggard

By 2025 the vast majority of mega-cities will be located in emerging markets:

Population Growth of Cities

Those blue dots represent cities with a population greater than 10 million.

The U.S. will only have two of them — New York and L.A. — and they're already built.

The rest will be in South America, Africa, and Asia — the Mumbais, Sao Paolos, and Manilas of the world.

And all these developing nations know one thing: They need cheap electricity to thrive, to power homes and schools and computers and factories and businesses and datacenters.

And you know what? They're doing it — and much faster and more efficiently than we are.

Examples? I've got plenty...

In 1980, only 7% of Indonesia's 155 million people had access to electricity.

Today, 60% of Indonesia's 260 million have access. And by 2025, 90% of its 300 million people will be grid-connected.

South Africa has connected 2.5 million households to the grid in the past seven years. They've installed one kilometer of new transmission line every 5 minutes since 2003.

In Africa as a whole, 50% of new infrastructure deployed in the next decade will be dedicated to power generation and transmission.

Vietnam has connected 400 people per hour to the grid for the past 15 years. And don't bother checking that math. I did, and it's correct.

And these countries aren't building an outdated energy network like we have here in the States...

They're bypassing coal and leap-frogging us to a clean energy future.

See ya later, suckers

There are currently six billion people on this planet. There will be 9 billion of us by 2050.

According to the CIA World Factbook, countries with the highest population growth rates include the United Arab Emirates, Niger, Kenya, Rwanda, and plenty of other nations centered around the equator, where there are vast natural resources: solar, biomass, and yes, oil and natural gas.

And their growing populations are hungry for energy. Around the world, 1.6 billion people still lack basic access to electricity.

But that's changing to our detriment.

Take Saudi Arabia, for example, the world's largest oil producer. It's currently building 6 new cities and 70% of its population is under 25 years old.

If they keep up this growth, they'll be using two-thirds of their vast oil reserves domestically.

And they certainly don't want to do that — not when they can sell it to us at $70 per barrel or better.

So what are they doing?

They're rapidly developing their immense solar and geothermal resources, aiming to run their country with renewable power while selling their oil to us.

It's brilliant.

We're blowing our chance to reduce our dependence on oil and coal — we have 5% of the global population and use 25% of the world's oil — while the counties that sell us that oil are transitioning to renewables.

And it's not just the Saudis...

The UAE has committed $22 billion — much of it petrodollars that we sent them — to developing renewable energy.

Kenya will develop 4,000 MW of clean energy in the next 20 years. Ghana is exploiting its palm oil resources. Tanzania is emerging as a sugar ethanol leader.

Perhaps the best example is Papua New Guinea (PNG), where Exxon Mobile (NYSE: XOM) is leading a $15 billion project to bring the county's 22.5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas to market.

But PNG doesn't want the gas... They want the revenue from the gas to build out clean infrastructure; harnessing their hydro, geothermal, and biomass resources as they sell the gas to the U.S. and the rest of the world.

The message is clear: You guys go ahead and waste time with coal and oil. Pay us for it while we beat you to a clean energy future.

And that's why almost half of the $214 billion expected to be invested in clean energy this year will be deployed outside the U.S. and Europe, with China getting the lion's share.

This chart says it all:

Global Clean Energy Growth Rates

If this doesn't get you fired up, I don't know what will.

Call it like you see it,

Nick Hodge

Nick

P.S. I heard someone say the conference that if you want to create a policy to destroy your energy industry, you'll do what the U.S. has done for the past 15 years. No other country is making our mistakes, especially China. They already have the world's largest wind market and produce 50% of solar materials worldwide. They also have 3 of the 10 biggest wind companies and 6 of the top 10 solar companies. We've got to put our money there if we want to profit.


Media / Interview Requests? Click Here.



Editor's Note: From solar and wind to geothermal and biofuels, Green Chip readers want to know which renewable energy resource will take over where fossil fuels leave off. The answer is...all of the above!

There is no one single solution to today's energy crisis. However, the combination of all viable renewable energy resources, coupled with energy efficiency, conservation and smart grid development will not only lead us to energy independence and a cleaner, more sustainable energy infrastructure — but also to what will soon prove to be the greatest investment opportunity of the 21st Century.







Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (7 votes)




Comments:

Comment by FRED ANYZESKI on 2010-07-01
I JUST STARTED READING YOUR ARTICLES AND YOU SAY IT LIKE I THINK IT BUT BETTER! KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK... IT WOULD BE GREAT IF OUR LEADERS WOULD EMBRACE THE FACTS AND GET SOME GUTS AND LEAD US... THANKS FOR THE FACTS!
Comment by Mark Swann on 2010-07-01
The one alternative energy technology that the USA may be able to maintain the lead in is ocean thermal energy, which harnesses solar energy stored in the tropical and subtropical oceans. The two leading companies in this sector are Lockheed-Martin and a private company which first championed it in the 1970's and is still the technological leader.

Ocean thermal is an enormous resource available 24/7, rain or shine, giving it an enormous advantage over wind and solar which only have operating capacities of around 30%.
Comment by Dave Swan on 2010-07-01
A great article! Time to pull up our socks and make things happen!
Comment by Johnny de Vulcan on 2010-07-01
in these times, fighting the good fight, it is necessary to stick to the truth;there is an awfull lot of yellow dots i Scandinavia where no city has more than 1 million (Copenhagen)citizens.Only if all Swedes moved into one city could this be accomplished,do pay attention to details a well. Personally I foresee that people wll move out of cities -and live in the huge forests that arenecessary because forests are the only to clean the air and make new oxygen (oceans provide 7%, forests and vegetation 93%) No trees no humans. Bad air: PLANT TREES!!!
Comment by Steve-O on 2010-07-01
It took us 40 years to get to where are. We will experience the greatest depression in our lifetime. The (3) main reasons for our downfall is: 1. The WELFARE SYSTEM 2. The forced integration of the educational system 3. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION quotas. We are DONE and we are not coming back.
Comment by Namon on 2010-07-01
Amazing statistics and well written.
Comment by Gabriele on 2010-07-02
Oh yes around the equator- vast natural resources: solar, biomass, oil and natural gas..but solar,wind and biomass are the only sustainable resources and what about the most important one? CLEAN WATER! Coca Cola is the biggest sf... first of all we need to protect the human right for fresh water! no water no human no trees..everything is getting artificial around the equator..probably the way in 2100 but only wise development pays back and survives, not the money driven one! sorry for our grandchildren!
Comment by Louise Strauss on 2010-07-02
Wind and solar energy are only effective in limited areas and cannot produce enough for our needs. We must build nuclear energy plants as Europe did. France produces 75-80% of their energy from Nuclear power. Contrary to the fear mongers it is safe, efficient, reliable and inexpensive. Are you doing this to push Obama's detrimental cap and trade? It sounds like it. That would be fiscally the worst thing for this country and people. f
Comment by Wind4me on 2010-07-03
When will USA wake up???
We love to talk a lot in USA as China kicks our butts in green power.
Comment by John Loren on 2010-07-04
What happen to Cellulosi Ethanol

The whole world is using and building it except for USA
Comment by Marty on 2010-07-04
Reality hits hard. When you fail to move with change, when you fail to innovate and drive change, then you can become overrun by it.
We need to use much less energy in self indulgence, and we need to produce new energy streams through applied technology, or some one else will. They are in fact doing it as we sit talking.

But let's face it. The powers that control us are out of control. Something is happening that we aren't going to like so much. Something that will make all of us much more humble, and much less powerful.

Oh well. Stupid is as stupid does. Losers earn what they get. Winners are blessed with security and ease. Everyone else suffers under the burden of their collective weight.


The one who brings the best game to the field is the one who wins. Let's get going.
SHARE / RATE