Rate:
Share
Views: 2335
Text Size:

Bali Climate Conference

Tropical Depression and Developing Intentions

By Nick Hodge
Tuesday, December 4th, 2007

In the current edition of Nature Geoscience, scientists claim that the earth's tropical belt is expanding faster than expected, saying, "Remarkably, the tropics appear to have already expanded--during only the last few decades of the 20th century--by at least the same margin as models predict for this century."

According to previous models, the tropics were to extend 2 degrees north and south by the end of the 21st century. But only eight years into it, the tropics have already expanded by at least that much, as confirmed by five independent studies.

Traditionally, the Tropics of Cancer and Capricorn bounded the tropics on the north and south, respectively. But that was simply determined by the Earth's tilt on its axis. Now, climate scientists say, it's time to define the tropics by what's actually happening on the ground. And what's happening is a widening of tropical climate toward the Earth's poles.

That poleward movement would correspond to similar movement of seasonal storms. "The jet streams are moving poleward, and so, presumably, would the storm tracks," said co-author Dian Seidel of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. This development would have negative implications for agriculture and water resources in nations located in the affected zones.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which, coincidentally, is trying to negotiate a successor to the Kyoto Protocol this week, predicted this type of movement.

Those negotiations are taking place in Bali, Indonesia, a location that faces significant risks associated with climate change. In fact, just this week, Indonesian scientists reported that some Indonesian islands could be completely submerged by rising seas if nothing is done to curb climate change.

Just last week, the sea broke through barriers and flooded a major road to the international airport in the nation's capital, Jakarta. According to Environment Minister and conference host Rachmat Witoelar, if Indonesia is affected by rising seas "tens of millions of people would have to move out of their homes. There is no way this will happen without conflict."

Hopefully, that dire warning will serve as inspiration to the thousands of diplomats gathered in Bali this week.

Developed and Developing

But the representatives didn't seem too eager to bail out Indonesia's sinking islands. Instead, amid many opening day ceremonies, diplomats began to argue about whether or not developing nations, like China and India, should face the same emissions caps as developed nations.

Some said China and India are being asked to do too much, while others argued they are not doing enough. But, even among the disagreement, there was a glimmer of hope.

The consortium did agree to find ways to transfer more clean technology , like solar and wind, to developing nations--a surefire way to ensure greater participation on their part beyond Kyoto.

It could be that's what such nations were waiting for--a little support.

In fact, last week China's chief climate negotiator Yu Qingtai said that they would "definitely do more" to cut emissions if wealthier nations were willing to share more clean energy technology with China.

Of course, that raises a few questions. For starters, isn't that where Suntech Power (NYSE: STP) is based? And isn't that company doing pretty well, having doubled in price since July of this year?

solar power company suntech power stp chart

Isn't China also the place China Sunergy Co. (NASDAQ: CSUN) and Yingli Green Energy (NYSE: YGE) call home? Two other solar companies that have done pretty well.

And yet, one can certainly see the other side of the coin. Why should China have to cap its emissions if an industrialized and wealthy nation like the US shows no inclination to do so?
 ,
Especially when US emissions, per capita, are about 20.6 metric tons, compared to China's 3.8 metric tons. And when nearly a quarter of China's emissions stem from the production of exported goods for the consumption of rich nations. China calls those "transfer emissions," and they're a big concern not only for China, but also for other developing nations.

Plus, China did decrease its energy intensity (the energy used to generate each dollar of national income) by 3% in the first three quarters of the year. It has also set a goal of reducing energy intensity 20% by 2010.

Premier Wen Jiabao keeps saying that his country is taking firm action to protect the environment, increase energy efficiency, boost the use of renewable resources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

And investors are taking notice. China is poised to surpass its 2010 wind installation targets this year--over two years ahead of schedule. By 2020, the rapidly growing nation hopes to produce 8% of its power from renewable resources, not including hydropower.

That seems like an attainable goal, especially because China is using its low-cost production base to manufacture renewable energy components. And a new national rule ensures that any wind turbines installed are 70% manufactured in China.

All these developments should provide nice returns to our subscribers, either through Green Chip Stocks or our latest publication, Green Chip International.

Make sure to keep an eye out for the latter, as we'll be providing sign-up information shortly.

In the meantime, we'll continue to watch investment opportunities abroad and the two-week conference in Bali.

Until next time,

nick hodge sig

Nick


Editor's Note: From solar and wind to geothermal and biofuels, Green Chip readers want to know which renewable energy resource will take over where fossil fuels leave off. The answer is...all of the above!

There is no one single solution to today's energy crisis. However, the combination of all viable renewable energy resources, coupled with energy efficiency, conservation and smart grid development will not only lead us to energy independence and a cleaner, more sustainable energy infrastructure — but also to what will soon prove to be the greatest investment opportunity of the 21st Century.







Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (15 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by Robert Gibbons on 2007-12-04
All well and good that advanced nations ask China and India to do their part to limit carbon emissions, but what threatens the former is exactly what threatens the U.S. Namely, grossly accelerating disparity between "haves" and "have-nots".

China could make it best growth in GDP and decreased emissions by empowering their rural outback farmers with efficient Diesel-powered tractors and trucks for agri-tasks and local transport and mobility.
See www.tructor.com
The answer for the U.S. and the Euro block is obviously nuclear fusion and mobile hydrogen for vehicles and other energy-intensive uses. Solar, wind and geo-thermal can play their low-intensity roles, but only H2 can liberate the west from oil & coal and retain a semblance of our standard of living.
Comment by Pete Pfeiffer on 2007-12-05
Let's get on the cheap, no CO2, wagon! Generate the needed Electricity with PBMRs. Small grids, control of used up pebbles, build for 3 year projected needs, safe because of no meltdown character.

Dispose of waste nuclear materiel by placing on subducting tectonic plate boundaries (geologic deep trenches) using "casketed" containers and piloted monitoring to prove viability of method.

Email me ppfeiwa@earthlink.net
Comment by Steve on 2007-12-05
The only way 70% can be obtained by the Chinese would be to copy GE technology sold to them as turbines and electrical components. Does the word communist mean anything, anymore?
Comment by Greg1 on 2007-12-05
Excellent article espec. with some
factual information included.
It gives a heads up on G.Warming and what other countries are doing and not doing- like the U.S. and Canada.
Thanks. G.
Comment by Bob on 2007-12-06
per capita emmissions are TOTTALLY irrelevant. What matters is the total amount of energy consumed/emissions. If you simply take just the amount of crude oil the USA consumes and calculate the total emissions, then compare the total amount of crude oil that China consumes and calculate their total emissions you will discover that, while China consumes only about 20% of the crude oil that the self depricating Americans do, China's emissions per barrell of crude is some where around 500 TIMES that of the USA. Why don't you quit with the skewed self serving and meaningless statistic like per capita and figure out what is best for all of us. China's emissions are very nearly the same in total as those of the USA but they are only burning one-fifth of the energy. IN SHORT they burn it dirtier and less efficient and are only second in this respect to Russia. America is the most energy efficient nation on the earth, EXCEPT for Japan and possibly Germany. Get off the bash America kick and get on with true energy efficiency the good old American way.