Rate:
Share
Views: 5923
Text Size:

The Alternative Energy Economy

Energy Change: It's Coming

By Nick Hodge
Tuesday, October 28th, 2008

You're well aware of all the green catchphrases by now.

Almost any slogan or jingle that can contain anything green has now been used.

We know what greenwashing is. We're all in favor of energy independence.

We're familiar with green building, energy audits, and carbon footprints.

But a new age of green buzzwords is emerging that carry even more meaning than their predecessors.

Instead of representing one angle or aspect of going green, these new phrases encompass the entire idea, including economic and societal implications.

Specifically, the phrase I'm referring to is Alternative Energy Economy.

Alternative Energy Economy

In prior articles, I've referred to this notion as the new energy economy. But since alternative and renewable energy is going to play such a large role going forward, Alternative Energy Economy seems now to be more correct.

Either way, those terms have come to represent a paradigm shift in how the world sees and uses energy.

They're all-encompassing terms, synonymous with energy revolution, moonshot, and the Manhattan Project.

Some are calling it the Apollo Project for a new century.

Here's what it means, in a nutshell.

First off, decreasing our reliance on oil—both foreign and domestic—could start to inject some of the $1 trillion or more we spend on the stuff every year. Much more if you count the security costs.

Of course, we won't become oil independent overnight, but every barrel saved is a deposit in the collective domestic piggy bank.

Then, the money we save oil, coupled with copious government and private investment, can be funneled to facilitate the deployment of alternative energy resources.

This is the first pillar of an alternative energy economy: energy conservation and renewed investment.

From there, we can look forward to direct, tangible benefits to the real economy.

To get into them, we need a starting point, a base case.

With the election a week away, and most critical state polls heavily favoring the democratic candidate, let's use Barack Obama's alternative energy plan as a springboard.

(Please note: This is not an endorsement of Obama or a counting-the-chickens-before-they-hatch scenario, but rather an objective reference based on the available poll data and the likely outcome of the election at this writing.)

An Obama-Based Alternative Energy Economy

Obama's plan is indeed an Apollo project for alternative energy.

The plan seeks to rapidly accelerate the world's transition to renewable fuels, while turbocharging the economy and weaning us off our dependency for cheap credit at the same time.

Here's what Time Magazine had to say about his plan in relation to the current economic problems:

He wants to launch an "Apollo project" to build a new alternative energy economy. His rationale for doing so includes some hard truths about the current economic mess: "The engine of economic growth for the past 20 years is not going to be there for the next 20. That was consumer spending. Basically, we turbocharged this economy based on cheap credit." But the days of easy credit are over, Obama said, "because there is too much deleveraging taking place, too much debt." A new economic turbocharger is going to have to be found, and "there is no better potential driver that pervades all aspects of our economy than a new energy economy ... That's going to be my No. 1 priority when I get into office.

So what exactly would an Apollo Project for energy look like?

According to the Apollo Alliance, which Obama supports, a rigorous program channeling $500 billion over 10 years to alternative energy projects is needed. That money would be dedicated to:

  • Generate clean power (25% from renewable sources by 2025)

  • Improve energy conservation and efficiency

  • Cut energy bills

  • Improve US technological and industrial capabilities

  • Create 5 million green-collar jobs

Compared to what we're currently facing, each one of those bullets would be a welcomed change.

25% renewable power compared to today's 6%.

Improved energy conservation and efficiency instead of complacent energy waste and misuse.

Reduced energy bills compared to the current high and volatile prices.

A renewed dedication to science and math, from childhood on up, that puts America back on top of today's information-based economy and allows us to export energy technology to the rest of the world.

The creation of 5 million new well-paid and secure green jobs instead of the 760,000 we've lost so far this year.

Such is the second pillar of an alternative energy economy: initiating programs from the top down that facilitate a culture change in which the country makes solving the energy crisis a priority and an opportunity.

Realizing an Alternative Energy Economy

The third pillar of an alternative energy economy is this: migrating from ideas to action and seeing real change, progress, and results.

Once the policies have been implemented and the strategy is in place, action will commence.

Free market initiative combined with government oversite and support will lead to renewed and sustained investment, the creation of jobs, and the deployment of voluminous amounts of renewable energy projects and capacity in the form of new wind farms, solar installations, geothermal and tidal use, electric vehicles, and new electricity transmission.

The government will have new tax revenue to support energy projects, the real economy will benefit from newfound jobs and savings from stable energy prices for home and auto, and American society will benefit from private and corporate re-investment in our education system and communities.

That's how I see the fundamentals of an alternative energy economy.

Of course, there will be long-term, unquantifiable, and unforeseen benefits as well—cleaner air, increased productivity, national pride, and a sense of unity to name few.

And, along with new new investment at the government and private early round levels, will come new green investment opportunities for us and increased profits from the already established renewable energy companies.

It's going to be a great thing.

Call it like you see it,

nick hodge

Nick

P.S. Big Oil already knows about the new energy economy, and now they're quickly trying to change gears so they can get a piece of the action. But it's not going to happen. They're simply too late. It's going to be the companies already in the game and the new green companies making a name for themselves now that will get the lion's share of the renewable energy profits. Savvy investors like you have the chance to profit, too! Read this full report on why Big Oil will fail in its pursuit of renewable energy and how you can profit from the companies that will succeed.


Editor's Note: From solar and wind to geothermal and biofuels, Green Chip readers want to know which renewable energy resource will take over where fossil fuels leave off. The answer is...all of the above!

There is no one single solution to today's energy crisis. However, the combination of all viable renewable energy resources, coupled with energy efficiency, conservation and smart grid development will not only lead us to energy independence and a cleaner, more sustainable energy infrastructure — but also to what will soon prove to be the greatest investment opportunity of the 21st Century.







Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (21 votes)

Comment on this Article


Comments:

Comment by pumapaws on 2008-10-28
Obama and his advisors know nothing about eneragy or how to provide it. Everything they propose will make prices MUCH higher and supplies inadequate.
Comment by Greg Olson on 2008-10-28
For 4 years (1988-'92) I worked on an energy conservation program for Wisconsin Electric Power Company in SE WI. We conserved 125MW mainly in flourscent ballast replacements. There isn't anything "NEW" that can save more energy. Conservation at this level is impossible. We NEED Nuclear Power plants, not solar or wind power.
Comment by Al on 2008-10-28
The Obama plan you mention depends upon the details - as always the devil is in the details. I don't see drilling for Oil as part of the plan to transition to the alt energy and there is plenty of opportunity to waste money on good ideas that can't be implemented - as I say the devil is in the details.An Apollo plan will require a partnership with the powerplant and auto industries as well as provisions to stop environmentalists from preventing any new starts.
Comment by Ivan Hills on 2008-10-29
You must have heard Alan Greenspan finger "computer modelling of risk" as a prime contributor to the sub-prime meltdown. Well, global warming is predicted by computer modelling. As a physicist friend of mine remarked about modelling: "Garbage in! Garbage out!" Beware of experts.
Comment by paul on 2008-10-29
I enjoyed you article and agree with your assessment of the "alternative energy economy." I have not read your article on why "big oil" will fail in their pursuit of renewable energy but you'll have to be very persuasive to agree with you ..... I certainly hope you're right though!
Comment by RJ on 2008-10-29
Nice article too bad it is not that easy. I hope most of the job creation and energy independence does come to pass regardless of the next president. Barack's party represents the hard core environmentalists and they always want to block any type of new constructuon.
Comment by philip andrews on 2008-10-29
why don't I see the word nuclear in this article?
Comment by Chuck S on 2008-10-29
It doesn't make sense to build an energy economy based on heavy subsidies. That causes resouces to go from efficient free enterprize energy to inefficient altenative energy. All those jobs come from jobs lost by high taxes on every other business. At least we should have an accounting of the total cost of subsidized and non-subsidized energy so we'll all know how much alternatives really cost.
How about an expanded non-subsidized energy economy - drilling offshore, in Alaska, etc. will make real jobs that pay for themselves with little or no subsidies. Private businesses will do what they do relatively efficiently.
Comment by Jim on 2008-10-29
Obviosly another Obama nut! Middle East, Venezuela, and Russian Oil dependancy is what we must eliminate first. The way you do that is to produce the oil available from our many sources here at home and lock it in here at home so that it cannot be "sold" to nut cases listed..
From this wwe use the proceeds to build altenative energy facilities such as nuclear plants and clean coal tecnology. The rest will follow with government "incentives" which will in turn provide the jobs needed to sustain a strong economy. Simplicity not "comprehensive" government intevention" is the answer and quickest way for the US to clean up it's act. Oil companies are not the enemy, they are a much needed ally and should not be demonized. We must "eliminate" all oil supplied by the above forever!
Comment by F rederick Dallinger on 2008-10-29
I enjoyed having you evaluate and
high light the main points in senator Obama's proposed energy
policy and its impact in todays economy and also in the help to
improve our air quality.
I am a senior,67, who is still very
involved in energy independence
and alternative energy projects.
Comment by Eric Williams on 2008-10-30
The hopes for an alternative power source like what we are getting from coal and nat-gas is a dream. The above CO2 effluents give power generation so that when you slip the switvch the lights go on. With Solar and wind...you could flip the switch and the sun has set and the winds are calm. The answer is not alternative power, it is an expansion of the 104 nuc pwr plants that have been operating for decades. Every county needs a nuc pwr plant using the submarine design so that if we need more submarines we sacrifice a county and hook it up to the nearest adjacent county. We need electric cars, hybrids at first while the nuc pwr is coming on stream. The gov't will have to exchange what you have for what is the next generation auto. The next concept is flextime. Nobody goes to work. Work is done on-line and at home where you are a charter school for your kids. GM and Chrysler are already just about out of business...they should come back with no internal combustion engine vehicles. This is what I see over the energy horizon. Another thing...we should stop publicizing our desire for change and saying that we need energy independence from countries that don't like us. One of these days they will switch from the dollar to the euro and tell us to go back to horses. Ever heard of international diplomacy ? What I hear now isn't it. Eric Williams
Comment by srinivas nedunuri on 2008-11-01
Jim wrote "Middle East, Venezuela, and Russian Oil dependancy is what we must eliminate first." This is wrong. Its like saying we need to eliminate our dependency on Afghan heroin. The problem is not dependency on "middle eastern" oil, the problem is dependency on oil. First we get ourselves off oil, which necessarily involves a mix of other sources: wind, solar, geothermal, and perhaps nuclear. The dependency on other countries then follows. But any nuclear plant won't come online for at least another 10 years. I am not sure where these secret deposits of oil are that Jim refers to but Alaska has about 6 months worth, and Albertas tar sands well they're a climate change nightmare, their extraction spewing out more CO2 than the consumption of the oil itself
Comment by srinivas nedunuri on 2008-11-02
Jim wrote "Middle East, Venezuela, and Russian Oil dependancy is what we must eliminate first." This is wrong. Its like saying we need to eliminate our dependency on Afghan heroin. The problem is not dependency on "middle eastern" oil, the problem is dependency on oil. First we get ourselves off oil, which necessarily involves a mix of other sources: wind, solar, geothermal, and perhaps nuclear. The dependency on other countries then follows. But any nuclear plant won't come online for at least another 10 years. I am not sure where these secret deposits of oil are that Jim refers to but Alaska has about 6 months worth, and Albertas tar sands well they're a climate change nightmare, their extraction spewing out more CO2 than the consumption of the oil itself
Comment by John Toeppen on 2008-11-04
I believe that many readers who wrote comments have missed the point of the article. A 25% increase in renewable energy resources is a sensible goal as it allows us to reinvest the savings created by reduced fuel expenditures. Oil is finite and will be extracted by private enterprise as long as it available and subsidized. Be clear on this point, it is subsidized now, and many of our policies have been set by oil barons. The proposed ten year investment will cost us less than we have spent on our war to provide oil for Europe, India, and China. We have not, and will, not prosper as a Nation when we spend in that way. Why don’t we invest in technologies that provide long term returns on our investments? America should be the fountain head for sustainable energy, energy technology, and energy hardware.

Wind power is already a profitable way to generate power without subsidies. Natural gas is a suitable fuel for vehicles, especially fleet vehicles and aircraft. Our nuclear industry needs a good technical revitalization to become safe and practical. Algae based biofuel provides a great opportunity with the capability of capturing CO2 from coal burning plants while providing hundreds of times more energy per acre than corn or cellulose ever could. It is absurd that we only have small test facilities for proven technologies when we have a capable Department of Energy, National Labs, and private investors. Energy is the Nation Security issue of our times. We can’t allow our priorities to be set by talk show radio hosts when we have solid data from NASA and our National Labs regarding climate change and energy alternatives.

I would strongly suggest turning off the radio and reading technical papers from referred journals on energy and climate. This is the moment to realize that the greatest failures of our time come from the belief that the failed ways of the past can create a brighter future. This is just not about politics, jobs, or the environment. This is about investments, technologies, applied science, and industry. This is the time for America to reinvent and reinvest itself using science and world class engineering. It is time for America to rise to the occasion.

John Toeppen
Livermore California

Comment by CHARLES LA RUE on 2008-11-20
I would like you to know I have been trying for more then 2 years to get the Govenor of California to take a serious look at a technology that can reduce the power used in every home and business Air Conditioning systems by 25 to 30 percent.But he refuses to even speak to me or even take a look at a technology that can really help our States energy conservation goals. How can he do this when he chooses to be closed minded on a new technology that can and does perform as stated.
So before you endorse him as the Green Giant maybe we need to look else where for someone who is open minded enough to see the real picture.
Thank you for your ear to my opinion.
Comment by sherry on 2008-11-26
Not enough credit is being given to the high gas prices this past year and it's serious damage on our economy and society. That one factor alone has caused serious stress in both individuals and businesses. A record number of homes and jobs have been lost as a direct result. And, while we are doing the happy dance around the lower prices at the pumps OPEC is announcing cuts to manipulate the prices upward again. We must get on with becoming energy independent.We can't take another year like this past.